2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.displa.2017.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of interface layout on the usability of In-Vehicle Information Systems and driving safety

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has set limits for glance duration time (less than 2 s on average), Number of glance time (less than 15% of the total), and total eyes-off-road time (TEORT; 12 s) for in-vehicle devices (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2012). A number of IVIS studies have also attempted to provide guidance by examining driving performance and risks in relation to touch button size (Feng et al, 2018;Kim et al, 2014) and layout (Li, Chen et al, 2017). As more and more functions are added to the actual vehicle's IVIS, combinations of numerous factors (i.e., button size, shape, color, border, symbol, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has set limits for glance duration time (less than 2 s on average), Number of glance time (less than 15% of the total), and total eyes-off-road time (TEORT; 12 s) for in-vehicle devices (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2012). A number of IVIS studies have also attempted to provide guidance by examining driving performance and risks in relation to touch button size (Feng et al, 2018;Kim et al, 2014) and layout (Li, Chen et al, 2017). As more and more functions are added to the actual vehicle's IVIS, combinations of numerous factors (i.e., button size, shape, color, border, symbol, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the improvement of informationization as well as the development of human–computer interactions, icons have become an important component of digital user interfaces ( Li, Chen, Sha, & Lu, 2017 ; Nakamura & Zeng-Treitler, 2012 ). Compared with words, graphic symbols are able to transcend language barriers ( Bocker, 1996 ; Caplin, 2001 ; Stevens, Brennan, Petocz, & Howell, 2009 ) and convey large amounts of information in a more concise and efficient way ( Amer & Maris, 2007 ; Chi & Dewi, 2014 ; Ells & Dewar, 1979 ; Huang, Bias, & Schnyer, 2015 ; Muter & Mayson, 2007; Perry, Stevens, Wiggins, & Howell, 2008 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an important carrier of information, icons are widely used in digital interfaces, such as those of desktop computers, smartphones, mobile tablets, environmental monitoring systems, and multimedia systems in automobiles, serving as interpretive channels between users and information systems (Chi & Dewi, 2014; Li et al., 2017; X. Ma et al., 2015; Silvennoinen et al., 2017; SriLakshmi et al., 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%