1983
DOI: 10.1021/ac00258a004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of interferogram sampling of gas chromatography/Fourier transform infrared data on Gram-Schmidt chromatogram reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…V ′ is then normalized; we denote this set of vectors by E = [ e 1 , e 2 , e 3 , ..., e n ]. De Haseth and Isenhour devised an ingenious way to bypass the Fourier transform calculation and directly construct GC-FTIR chromatograms through the Gram–Schmidt vector orthogonalization method. However, the GC-FTIR and GC-MRR signals are fundamentally different. There is a strong signal corresponding to zero light absorption in the GC-FTIR blank interferogram.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…V ′ is then normalized; we denote this set of vectors by E = [ e 1 , e 2 , e 3 , ..., e n ]. De Haseth and Isenhour devised an ingenious way to bypass the Fourier transform calculation and directly construct GC-FTIR chromatograms through the Gram–Schmidt vector orthogonalization method. However, the GC-FTIR and GC-MRR signals are fundamentally different. There is a strong signal corresponding to zero light absorption in the GC-FTIR blank interferogram.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This magnitude is a measure of the total infrared absorbance of the sample. These operations were fully described in the depends on both the spectral characteristics of the compound (5,6) and interferometer stability (4,6). Signal due to sample absorption is greatest at the centerburst and decays with increasing distance from the centerburst, with the rate of decay dependent on the bandwidths of the peaks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%