2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of internal pressure and surface tension on the growth-induced wrinkling of mucosae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, the stress in the submucosal–mucosal layer was found to be higher than in the muscle layer owing to the differences in structure and material properties in these two layers. Furthermore, the patterns of mucosal folds are dictated by the thickness and the mechanical properties of the esophageal mucosal and submucosal layers . A recent anatomy‐based lower esophageal sphincter (LES) model showed that the intraluminal pressure values predicted by the 3D model are mainly due to the contraction of the circular muscle layer, consistent with the predictions of experimental data found in the literature …”
Section: Computer Modeling Of Esophageal Functionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, the stress in the submucosal–mucosal layer was found to be higher than in the muscle layer owing to the differences in structure and material properties in these two layers. Furthermore, the patterns of mucosal folds are dictated by the thickness and the mechanical properties of the esophageal mucosal and submucosal layers . A recent anatomy‐based lower esophageal sphincter (LES) model showed that the intraluminal pressure values predicted by the 3D model are mainly due to the contraction of the circular muscle layer, consistent with the predictions of experimental data found in the literature …”
Section: Computer Modeling Of Esophageal Functionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Furthermore, the patterns of mucosal folds are dictated by the thickness and the mechanical properties of the esophageal mucosal and submucosal layers. [92][93][94] A recent anatomy-based lower esophageal sphincter (LES) model 11,12 showed that the intraluminal pressure values predicted by the 3D model are mainly due to the contraction of the circular muscle layer, consistent with the predictions of experimental data found in the literature. 18,31,95 Coupling with fluid stresses (pressure and shear stress) at the fluid-muscle interface Esophageal peristaltic transport is an inherently mechanical phenomenon coordinated by the central and enteric nervous systems; the transport of bolus requires mechanical activities from interrelationships between muscle contraction and intrabolus force.…”
Section: Computer Modeling Of Esophageal Functionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…For conceptual simplicity, we have initiated these alterations exclusively through the growth of the mucosal layer, while in reality, airway wall remodeling is a multifactorial process. In future studies, we will include the effects of the thickening of the smooth muscle layer [13,32] and of gradual alterations in composition across all three layers [3]. A more realistic model might also require us to incorporate the effects of anisotropic elasticity and anisotropic growth [41,48], for example, through an independent representation of surface growth [43,49] and thickness growth [40,44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fluid mechanics of the lung have been extensively studied using both idealized and patient-specific models [32,59]. However, existing solid mechanics studies which focus on three-dimensional biological geometries are few [54,63], mainly analytical [7,17], fail to predict emerging surface morphologies beyond the onset of folding [60,73], and typically neglect the characteristic branching of the lung [8, 27, 38]. Here we address these limitations by extending airway remodeling mechanics to realistic patient-specific airway branch models created from magnetic resonance images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%