2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00396-012-2604-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of ionic strength on the size and compactness of chitosan nanoparticles

Abstract: In this work, chitosan nanoparticles were prepared by ionotropic gelation of chitosan with tripolyphosphate (TPP). The effects of the ionic strength of the solvent employed in the particle preparation on the average size and compactness of the particles were investigated. In addition, the effects of the chitosan concentration and the crosslinker to polymer ratio on the particle characteristics were studied. The chitosan-TPP nanoparticles were characterized by dynamic light scattering, zeta potential, and turbi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
135
2
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
14
135
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…14 These conditions were in stark contrast to the salt effect studies conducted by others, 26,27,44 where much higher 0.05 -0.1 wt% final chitosan concentrations and DD-values that exceeded 90% were used. Thus, the seemingly conflicting findings on the salt effects appear to be reconciled by the present study.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Stability Studiescontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…14 These conditions were in stark contrast to the salt effect studies conducted by others, 26,27,44 where much higher 0.05 -0.1 wt% final chitosan concentrations and DD-values that exceeded 90% were used. Thus, the seemingly conflicting findings on the salt effects appear to be reconciled by the present study.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Stability Studiescontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Scheme 2A)(Jonassen, et al, 2012a, Jonassen, et al, 2012b. Therefore, the10 average size of NMPs increase and these results demonstrate opposite trends from other Huang and Lapitsky, 2011, Jonassen, et al, 2012a, Jonassen, et al, 2012b).…”
contrasting
confidence: 41%
“…Directly above the sample, an optical system with a light-scattering detector continuously monitored the scattered intensity signal (S) of the sample as it was subjected to prescribed temperature alterations. The relation between the signal and the turbidity (j) is given by the following empirical relationship [26] j (cm À1 ) = 9.0 Â 10 À9 S 3.751 . The temperature at which the first deviation of the scattered intensity from the baseline occurred was taken as the cloud point (CP) of the considered sample [19].…”
Section: Turbidimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…registered, and the average values of these runs were reported. The sample cell used was a dip-cell, including palladium electrodes with 2 mm spacing, one 12 mm glass cell PCS1115 cuvette, and a cap [26].…”
Section: Zeta (F) Potential Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%