2002
DOI: 10.1006/jare.2001.0948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of juniper cutting on nitrogen mineralization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both total organic N and bioavailable inorganic N (measured as resin sorbed NH 4 + -N) were signiWcantly greater under the juniper canopy compared to the heath. This contrasts with previous Wndings that demonstrated no elevated concentrations of inorganic N under undisturbed juniper canopies in arid scrublands (Bates et al 2002) and even reduced rates of N mineralization under shrub (Cornus drummondii) canopies in mesic grasslands (McCarron et al 2003). The diVerence between these shrub islands and the juniper islands in this study is the concentrated presence of the P. schreberi-cyanobacterial N Wxing association under the juniper canopy in the arctic tundra and no clear presence of N Wxing organisms in the North American studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both total organic N and bioavailable inorganic N (measured as resin sorbed NH 4 + -N) were signiWcantly greater under the juniper canopy compared to the heath. This contrasts with previous Wndings that demonstrated no elevated concentrations of inorganic N under undisturbed juniper canopies in arid scrublands (Bates et al 2002) and even reduced rates of N mineralization under shrub (Cornus drummondii) canopies in mesic grasslands (McCarron et al 2003). The diVerence between these shrub islands and the juniper islands in this study is the concentrated presence of the P. schreberi-cyanobacterial N Wxing association under the juniper canopy in the arctic tundra and no clear presence of N Wxing organisms in the North American studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…Our work demonstrates a signiWcant increase in total N concentration under the juniper canopy, but no trend for organic C. Similarly, North American studies demonstrate that organic N was dramatically elevated under western juniper canopies (Bates et al 2002;Klemmedson and Tiedemann 2000). Although there appears to be an upward trend for organic C in our system, the diVerences are not signiWcant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Studies have described the chronology of post-settlement establishment (after 1850) of juniper and pinon woodlands (Burkhardt and Tisdale, 1976;Tausch et al, 1981;Tausch and West, 1988;Knapp and Soulé, 1996;Miller and Rose, 1999;Miller et al, 2000Miller et al, , 2005 and the spatial variation of woodlands across the Great Basin (West et al, 1978). In addition, impacts of woodland encroachment on plant community composition and structure, hydrologic processes, nutrient cycling, and wildlife habitat have also been evaluated (Klopatek, 1987;Reinkensmeyer, 2000;Bates et al, 2002;Miller et al, 2000Miller et al, , 2005. Other studies have looked at the relationships linking soils and plant associations with woodland structure and the interaction between increasing juniper dominance and understory species (Koniak and Everett, 1982;Tausch and West, 1995;West, 1999;Miller et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase in pH beneath juniper may be partially attributed to the increase in lime. Bates et al (2002) also reported increases in soil pH beneath western juniper canopies compared to tree interspaces. Nutrient composition for aspen and juniper litter was also significantly different (Table 3).…”
Section: Effects Of Western Juniper On Soilmentioning
confidence: 97%