2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11157-013-9329-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of key parameters in recycling of metals from petroleum refinery waste catalysts in bioleaching process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where R is universal gas constant (8.314 J mol À1 K À1 ), E a activation energy of reaction and T absolute temperature. The linearized equation of eqn (16) is eqn (17) lnðrÞ…”
Section: Thermodynamic Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where R is universal gas constant (8.314 J mol À1 K À1 ), E a activation energy of reaction and T absolute temperature. The linearized equation of eqn (16) is eqn (17) lnðrÞ…”
Section: Thermodynamic Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,14 Using acids extracted from agricultural products are not only environmentally friendly but also good at resolving slow kinetics of bioleaching by microorganisms. [15][16][17] Moreover, using lemon juice as a renewable source of organic acids, the cost of leaching wastewater treatment is eliminated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the presence of spent catalyst from the petrochemical industry (HDS2R, ULSD/2010, and CAT_US) and catalytic converters (SAC-M1 and SAC-M2), the sulfate production in mg/L is 2627, 16,824, 21,430, 28,674, and 15,951 respectively, at the end of 21 days [12]. Thus, in the presence of solid wastes-containing metals, different factors and parameters can affect the sulfur-oxidizing activity of microorganisms, so the bioleaching process would be optimized by the manipulation of the follows parameters: (a) pulp density/solid-liquid ratio, (b) sulfur concentration, (c) microorganisms used, (d) culture media, (e) conditions of preliminary cultivations, (f) carbon dioxide, (g) population density, (h) osmotic pressure, (i) redox potential, (j) temperature, (k) water activity, (l) pH, (m) bioleaching period, (n) particle size, (o) shaking speed, (p) bioavailability of metal to the microorganism, (q) microbial requirements, (r) metal tolerance, (s) microorganisms adapted to waste, (t) waste's physiochemical properties, and (u) type of released metal, all of them could affect the sulfur-oxidizing activity [21][22][23][24]. Besides, it has been mentioned that during bioleaching, aeration with compressed air has a positive influence on sulfur-oxidizing activity, and an increase in the sulfate concentration improves the bioleaching process by the bacteria [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4b). 8 h of experiment brought 51% extraction yield that increased to 65% after 24 h and 87% V extraction yield was achieved after 72 h. Application of larger particles (100-200 µm) resulted in higher final extraction yields, which was rather surprising as the reduction of particle size is believed to enlarge the available reaction surface and therefore increase the leaching yields [43,44]. In case of both 0.1-M and 1-M CA, the smaller PD (10%) gave better results in terms of V amount extracted.…”
Section: Bioleaching Efficiency and Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 98%