“…In the presence of spent catalyst from the petrochemical industry (HDS2R, ULSD/2010, and CAT_US) and catalytic converters (SAC-M1 and SAC-M2), the sulfate production in mg/L is 2627, 16,824, 21,430, 28,674, and 15,951 respectively, at the end of 21 days [12]. Thus, in the presence of solid wastes-containing metals, different factors and parameters can affect the sulfur-oxidizing activity of microorganisms, so the bioleaching process would be optimized by the manipulation of the follows parameters: (a) pulp density/solid-liquid ratio, (b) sulfur concentration, (c) microorganisms used, (d) culture media, (e) conditions of preliminary cultivations, (f) carbon dioxide, (g) population density, (h) osmotic pressure, (i) redox potential, (j) temperature, (k) water activity, (l) pH, (m) bioleaching period, (n) particle size, (o) shaking speed, (p) bioavailability of metal to the microorganism, (q) microbial requirements, (r) metal tolerance, (s) microorganisms adapted to waste, (t) waste's physiochemical properties, and (u) type of released metal, all of them could affect the sulfur-oxidizing activity [21][22][23][24]. Besides, it has been mentioned that during bioleaching, aeration with compressed air has a positive influence on sulfur-oxidizing activity, and an increase in the sulfate concentration improves the bioleaching process by the bacteria [24].…”