2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.09.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of knee simulator control method and radiation dose on UHMWPE wear rate, and relationship between wear rate and clinical revision rate in National Joint Registry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the numerically obtained total wear results, when compared to the total wear of other knee replacements from the literature [36], PS, CR and Prototype TKRs are situated in the middle range (Table 4). This comparison serves as a basic validation for the multibody dynamic simulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the numerically obtained total wear results, when compared to the total wear of other knee replacements from the literature [36], PS, CR and Prototype TKRs are situated in the middle range (Table 4). This comparison serves as a basic validation for the multibody dynamic simulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase in contact area with newer conforming designs requires balance between decreasing articulating surface contact stress throughout the articulation area and potentially increasing wear of the implant [46][47][48]. Edge loading is also F I G U R E 3 Load versus displacement control: kinetics and kinematics profiles (a) rotational axis [24], (b) Load control, 2014 [25], (c) Displacement control 2014 [25] reduced in the event of femoral lift-off through coronal geometry modifications [49].…”
Section: Evolution Of Knee Implant Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase in contact area with newer conforming designs requires balance between decreasing articulating surface contact stress throughout the articulation area and potentially increasing wear of the implant [46][47][48]. Edge loading is also [25] reduced in the event of femoral lift-off through coronal geometry modifications [49].…”
Section: Evolution Of Knee Implant Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, a change in femoral CoR may have more of an effect on wear under the fixed kinematics of displacement control, as opposed to force control where an implant would respond to a change in testing conditions with a change in kinematics. In addition, the displacement controlled ISO Standard and other displacement control testing protocols are widely used (Abdelgaied et al, 2017;Abdel-Jaber et al, 2016Ash et al, 2000;Barnett et al, 2002Barnett et al, , 2001Brandt et al, 2011;Brockett et al, 2016Brockett et al, , 2012Galvin et al, 2009;McEwen et al, 2005;Mell et al, 2018;O'Brien et al, 2014;Okazaki et al, 2019;Popoola et al, 2010), making investigations into how the choice of CoR affects wear testing under displacement control all the more necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%