2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of land use and climate on carbon and nitrogen pool partitioning in European mountain grasslands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the difference in soil moisture between the PV arrays and the Ambient zones in this study did not reach a significant level, soil moisture in the PV arrays was still higher than in the Ambient (Figure b). The pH of the soil in Under is significantly higher than that in Ambient, which may be because the increase in soil moisture reduces the soil oxygen content and promotes denitrification, thereby increasing the soil pH (Figure c). The increase in pH from PV arrays may strongly increase the soil P fixation by calcium to reduce the soil AP (Figure i). , In addition, the alteration of soil pH could influence soil nutrient fixation and cause a difference in the soil C/N ratio (Figure d–f) between the PV arrays and the Ambient zones. , No significant change in NH 4 + –N inside and outside the PV array (Figure g). Plant uptake of negatively charged NO 3 – –N is affected by the flow of soil water in the roots, which explains the higher NO 3 – –N in areas with high water content (Figure h). , We found that the effect of PV arrays on vegetation characteristics was manifested in the Forb community and the A.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the difference in soil moisture between the PV arrays and the Ambient zones in this study did not reach a significant level, soil moisture in the PV arrays was still higher than in the Ambient (Figure b). The pH of the soil in Under is significantly higher than that in Ambient, which may be because the increase in soil moisture reduces the soil oxygen content and promotes denitrification, thereby increasing the soil pH (Figure c). The increase in pH from PV arrays may strongly increase the soil P fixation by calcium to reduce the soil AP (Figure i). , In addition, the alteration of soil pH could influence soil nutrient fixation and cause a difference in the soil C/N ratio (Figure d–f) between the PV arrays and the Ambient zones. , No significant change in NH 4 + –N inside and outside the PV array (Figure g). Plant uptake of negatively charged NO 3 – –N is affected by the flow of soil water in the roots, which explains the higher NO 3 – –N in areas with high water content (Figure h). , We found that the effect of PV arrays on vegetation characteristics was manifested in the Forb community and the A.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…69,70 In addition, the alteration of soil pH could influence soil nutrient fixation and cause a difference in the soil C/N ratio (Figure 3d−f) between the PV arrays and the Ambient zones. 70,71 No significant change in NH 4 + −N inside and outside the PV array (Figure 3g). Plant uptake of negatively charged NO 3 − −N is affected by the flow of soil water in the roots, which explains the higher NO 3 − −N in areas with high water content (Figure 3h).…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plant consumption by grazing might lead to the loss of plant biomass directly. Meanwhile, the loss resulted in reduced litter production that suppressed carbon and nitrogen inputs to below‐ground processes (Bai et al, 2022; Seeber et al, 2022), and a larger bare area promoted the evaporation of soil moisture, thus resulted in the decreased plant regrowth rates (Sitters et al, 2020). We found negative responses of above‐ground biomass and leaf area to grazing intensity, and significantly lower above‐ground biomass under heavy grazing (Figures 2 and 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grassland ecosystems play a key role in regulating the carbon cycle and maintaining ecological balance ( Bengtsson et al, 2019 ; Hoover et al, 2022 ; Shen et al, 2022a , b ). Net primary productivity (NPP) is not only a crucial indicator of carbon sequestration ( Zhang et al, 2016 ; Hossain et al, 2021 ), but also a key reference for assessing grassland ecosystem function ( Seeber et al, 2022 ; Wang et al, 2022 ). Previous studies have shown that climate change has significant effects on grassland NPP ( Liu et al, 2021 ; Xiong et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%