1980
DOI: 10.1017/s0014479700010723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Macronutrients and Cutting on Mulberry Cultivars in Malaysian Peat

Abstract: N, P and K fertilizers improved mulberry leaf, stem and fruit yields on peat, the optimum rates being ioo kg/ha/yr N, 25 kg P and 62-5 kg K, with further leaf responses to N and K if applied together in the ratio of 3:2. Harvesting every 2 months at 60 cm height gave better yearly leaf yields than cuttings 3-12 months apart, but annual stem yields were not affected by harvesting frequency and fruit yields were optimum when plants were cut at intervals of 5-6 months. Harvesting quarterly at 60 cm produced bette… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also observed a close seasonal relation between tuber yield and the degree of infestation with tuber weevil (Cylas formicarius). However, successive yield reductions may also have been partly due to progressive depletion of non-nitrogenous plant nutrients, since minimal P and K were applied throughout these experiments and increased availability of N with liming would then require additional K in order to maintain the N:K ratio needed to prevent reduced response to N (Chew et al, 1980a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also observed a close seasonal relation between tuber yield and the degree of infestation with tuber weevil (Cylas formicarius). However, successive yield reductions may also have been partly due to progressive depletion of non-nitrogenous plant nutrients, since minimal P and K were applied throughout these experiments and increased availability of N with liming would then require additional K in order to maintain the N:K ratio needed to prevent reduced response to N (Chew et al, 1980a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%