1987
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(87)90405-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of medial frontal cortex lesions on DRL performance in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, delayed alternation and reversal learning tasks require the subject to generate different responses to the same stimuli from trial to trial. In the rat, the former tasks are impaired by ventral orbital lesions whereas the latter tasks are disrupted by medial PFC lesions (Eichenbaum, Clegg, & Feeley, 1983; Finger et al, 1987; Kolb, Nonneman, & Singh, 1974; Nalwa & Rao, 1985; Neill, 1976). Thus the ventral orbital region may be essential for simple response inhibition, whereas medial areas may play a role both in generating differential responses to familiar stimuli that change their association with reward from trial to trial and in suppressing responses to stimuli previously associated with reward.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, delayed alternation and reversal learning tasks require the subject to generate different responses to the same stimuli from trial to trial. In the rat, the former tasks are impaired by ventral orbital lesions whereas the latter tasks are disrupted by medial PFC lesions (Eichenbaum, Clegg, & Feeley, 1983; Finger et al, 1987; Kolb, Nonneman, & Singh, 1974; Nalwa & Rao, 1985; Neill, 1976). Thus the ventral orbital region may be essential for simple response inhibition, whereas medial areas may play a role both in generating differential responses to familiar stimuli that change their association with reward from trial to trial and in suppressing responses to stimuli previously associated with reward.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies reported either a decreased reinforcement rate coupled with increased response rate while another demonstrated an increase in very short IRTs (Numan et al, 1975;Nalwa and Rao, 1985). However, several other studies failed to demonstrate an effect of medial frontal cortex lesions, although in one study the lesion may have spared the IL (Kolb et al, 1974;Finger et al, 1987). Several other studies with mPFC lesions that clearly appeared to spare the IL did not have an effect on DRL responding (Neill et al, 1974;Neill, 1976).…”
Section: Comparison Of Neurocircuitry Underlying 5-csrtt and Drl Behamentioning
confidence: 99%