This report discusses the use of in vitro systems to detect metal carcinogens and to provide inforna-tion on the mechanisms of metal carcinogenesis. The use of in vivo systems is also discussed, where they may provide additional information. Even though no single system has proven adequate for the definitive identification of all metal mutagens and carcinogens, the aggregate results of these studies indicate that the combined use of several systems may provide a valuable, initial screen for metals and their compounds. It is now imperative to evaluate more complex aggregates and mixtures of metals and their compounds that are environmentally ubiquitous (1). Metals appear to behave similarly to other carcinogens in cell transformation tests; however, they are frequently negative in bacterial mutagenesis revertant assays. In addition to rapid screening, cellular systems are particularly advantageous for analyzing the mechanism ofmetal mutagenesis and carcinogenesis. It is only in such systems that one may be able to study the mechanism and specificity of metal-induced cellular alterations which may be causative factors in neoplasia. The physiological chemistry of different metals may vary widely. For example, arsenic and chromium may exist in solution as anions, whereas most other carcinogenic metals exist principally as cations. A major difficulty with metal carcinogens is that no specific metal-nucleic acid interactions analogous to those obtained with organic chemical carcinogens and particular loci in DNA molecules have been observed in vivo. Although recent evidence suggests that most metals do not induce repair synthesis , studies using bacterial or eucaryotic mutants deficient in DNA repair pathways should provide valuable information on metal induced alterations and mechanisms of repair. Furthermore, these cellular assays provide an experimental setting for tracing the involvement of mutations in carcino-genesis. In addition, cell-free systems have permitted measurements of the effects of metals on the fidelity of DNA synthesis with the ultimate goal of analyzing in molecular terms the mechanism of metal carcinogenesis. Conversely, an understanding of metal-cellular interactions should provide new systems to more adequately evaluate the toxic, mutagenic and carcinogenic effects of metals common in our environment. In view of these difficulties and future prospects, recommendations are made in this report and in the commissioned papers to provide more infornation which will lead to an understanding of the mechanisms of metal carcino-genesis. Bacterial Mutagenesis Summary of Present Knowledge To date, bacterial mutagenesis systems have not been successful in predicting the carcinogenicity of 35