1994
DOI: 10.1016/0306-4565(94)90030-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of meteorological parameters on adequate evaluation of the thermal environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tennis court, for instance, is located adjacent to an asphalt parking lot but is separated by a mesh covered fence that would reduce wind speeds. Over each surface, the WBGT monitors were set up on the tripods at 1.2 m above the surface to represent an anthropometric scale [18]. The dry-bulb temperature, natural wet-bulb temperature, globe temperature, dewpoint temperature, and wind speed were collected every 10 min from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The tennis court, for instance, is located adjacent to an asphalt parking lot but is separated by a mesh covered fence that would reduce wind speeds. Over each surface, the WBGT monitors were set up on the tripods at 1.2 m above the surface to represent an anthropometric scale [18]. The dry-bulb temperature, natural wet-bulb temperature, globe temperature, dewpoint temperature, and wind speed were collected every 10 min from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dry-bulb temperature, natural wet-bulb temperature, globe temperature, dewpoint temperature, and wind speed were collected every 10 min from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. The WBGT was computed as a weighted average of the dry-bulb temperature (DB), natural wet-bulb temperature (WB), and globe temperature (GT) using the following equation [19]: Over each surface, the WBGT monitors were set up on the tripods at 1.2 m above the surface to represent an anthropometric scale [18]. The dry-bulb temperature, natural wet-bulb temperature, globe temperature, dewpoint temperature, and wind speed were collected every 10 min from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2C). Differences in sensor heights between meteorological observations (1.5-10 m above ground) and those measured on an anthropometric scale (1.2 m above ground) may have contributed to the observed differences in both T nwb and T bg (8,23). Differences in wind at anthropometric (1.2 m) and nonanthropometric scales (10 m) would, in particular, affect both measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is likely that greater misclassifications would have resulted from smaller category spans (20). Although the practical importance of 1-C-2-C WBGT category differences may seem small and probably makes no difference within the context of the sports medicine flag categories, they can have a significant effect in very hot and humid environments, especially when protective clothing is worn (23) or when work/rest cycles are required (25). Conditions above a sports medicine red flag (928-C) are grounds for canceling athletic events (1,12), but the same WBGT is only a green flag in the military, where less intense activity (G600 W) is expected to continue as long as the appropriate work/rest cycles are used (25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, WBGT has become embedded in military and industrial application such that the environmental data required to support the development of alternative models are not being collected (18). The crucial interactions between climate, human physiology, hydration status, clothing and other factors are too complex to be wholly described by a simple relationship between temperature(s) and human responses.…”
Section: Heat Strain Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%