In this review, thermally induced phase separation (TIPS) and electrospinning methods for preparation of fluoropolymer membranes are assessed, particularly for the polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) and polyethylene chlorotrifluoroethylene membranes. This review focuses on controlling the membrane morphology from the thermodynamic and kinetic perspectives to understand the relationship between the membrane morphology and fabrication parameters. In addition, the current status of the nonsolvent induced phase separation (NIPS) method and the combined NIPS-TIPS (N-TIPS) method, which is a new emerging fabrication method, are discussed. The past literature data are compiled and an upperbound curve (permeability vs. tensile strength) is proposed for the TIPS-prepared PVDF membranes. Furthermore, the key parameters that control and determine the membrane morphology when using the electrospinning method are reviewed. Exploiting the unique advantages of the electrospinning method, our current understanding in controlling and finetuning the PVDF crystal polymorphism (i.e., b-phase) is critically assessed. V C 2015 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 62: 461-490, 2016 Figure 15. Cross section of 40 wt % PVDF/GBL hollow fiber membranes: (left) with LiCl additive, (middle) with glycerol additive, (right) with LiCl and glycerol additives.Formation of such fine pores nearly doubled the flux without losing mechanical strength. 28 481 TEM images of 4 wt % PVP nanofibers from different compositions of EtOH/DMF: (b) 65/35, (c) 50/50, (d) 35/65, and (e) SEM image of 4 wt % PVP nanofibers using EtOH/DMF (50/50). 146 482