2017
DOI: 10.3390/ma10020113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Nanoscale V-Shaped Pits on GaN-Based Light Emitting Diodes

Abstract: This paper reviews the formation of nanoscale V-shaped pits on GaN-based light emitting diodes (LEDs) grown by the metal organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) system and studies the effect of V-shaped pits on quantum efficiency. Since V-pits could provide potential barriers around threading dislocations to lessen non-radiative recombinations in such a high defect environment. In our study, multiple InGaN/GaN quantum well samples with different emission wavelengths of 380, 420, 460, and 500 nm were grown, e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure d shows that their size and density increase with the number of SL layers (values are shown in Table ). These findings are supported by extant research, indicating that the V-pit density and size are also dependent on the growth conditions, indium composition, and MQW thickness, as well as the InGaN/GaN SL growth temperature and the location at which the V-pit formation commences. ,, For example, V-pits that emerged in the first SL layer have greater size compared to those that are formed in the middle or the top of SLs . According to our STEM observations, in all samples, V-pit generation is induced by the conditions at which the n -GaN layer is grown below the SLs.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure d shows that their size and density increase with the number of SL layers (values are shown in Table ). These findings are supported by extant research, indicating that the V-pit density and size are also dependent on the growth conditions, indium composition, and MQW thickness, as well as the InGaN/GaN SL growth temperature and the location at which the V-pit formation commences. ,, For example, V-pits that emerged in the first SL layer have greater size compared to those that are formed in the middle or the top of SLs . According to our STEM observations, in all samples, V-pit generation is induced by the conditions at which the n -GaN layer is grown below the SLs.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…5,23,25 For example, V-pits that emerged in the first SL layer have greater size compared to those that are formed in the middle or the top of SLs. 26 According to our STEM observations, in all samples, V-pit generation is induced by the conditions at which the n-GaN layer is grown below the SLs. Therefore, large V-pit sizes (exceeding 270 nm in diameter, as shown in Table 1) were observed, while sidewalls were formed along the [11̅ 01] direction comprising SLs and MQWs, resulting in much greater thickness, compared to that previously reported, 22,23 whereby thickness increased with the number of SLs incorporated into the structure.…”
Section: Optical Characterizationsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Since there is no correlation between wavelength shift and lifetime, there must be a mechanism that affects the EQE and the spectra, but not the IQE. It has been observed by Chen et al 29 that V-pits can alter the emission properties of LEDs during operation, with wavelength decreasing as total V-pit surface increases. V-pits cause strain relaxation, 30 which could cause a blue-shift in the surrounding QW emission, similarly to the edge.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in our fitting, we have to assume a uniform carrier distribution to calculate the carrier concentration. In a commercial LED, by using the V-pit technique [ 93 ], the hole injection uniformity at different QWs can be improved effectively through lateral injection from the sidewalls of V-pit. Thus, the QW number is usually around 10 or even up to 15.…”
Section: Carrier Lifetime Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%