1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1992.tb14522.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of neuropeptide Y and agonists selective for neuropeptide Y receptor sub‐types on arterioles of the guinea‐pig small intestine and the rat brain

Abstract: 1 The actions of neuropeptide Y (NPY) and agonists selective for NPY receptor subtypes were examined on arterioles from the guinea-pig small intestine and the rat pia in order to characterize the receptors mediating the vasoconstrictor and potentiating effects of NPY. 2 A method was developed for measuring the potentiating effects of NPY in situations where it was not possible to obtain a full concentration-response relationship for the vasoconstrictor. NPY, 50 nM, had a greater potentiating effect on the guin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

5
20
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may explain the potentiating effect of the peptide, since slight depolarizations caused either by raising extracellular K¤ (Mulvany et al 1982) or by denervation (Neild, 1987) are known to increase the sensitivity of arterial smooth muscle to several vasoconstrictors. NPY has been shown earlier to elicit depolarization in brain large arteries (Abel & Han, 1989) and pial arterioles (Xia, Neild & Kotecha, 1992) and in rat caudal artery (Neild, 1987). In these studies, as in the present experiments, the effects of the peptide on membrane potential were slow in onset and sustained, and NPY also caused a weak contraction but potentiated the vasoconstriction elicited by other agonists.…”
Section: ----------------------------------------------**P < 0·01 Vssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…This may explain the potentiating effect of the peptide, since slight depolarizations caused either by raising extracellular K¤ (Mulvany et al 1982) or by denervation (Neild, 1987) are known to increase the sensitivity of arterial smooth muscle to several vasoconstrictors. NPY has been shown earlier to elicit depolarization in brain large arteries (Abel & Han, 1989) and pial arterioles (Xia, Neild & Kotecha, 1992) and in rat caudal artery (Neild, 1987). In these studies, as in the present experiments, the effects of the peptide on membrane potential were slow in onset and sustained, and NPY also caused a weak contraction but potentiated the vasoconstriction elicited by other agonists.…”
Section: ----------------------------------------------**P < 0·01 Vssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The Y2-selective agonists, PYY-(13-36) (Wahlestedt & Hakanson, 1986) or N-acetyl[Leu28,Leu3`]NPY-(24-36) (Potter et al, 1994) in the same concentration (50 nM) significantly decreased the response. Representative traces are shown in Figure 1, and quantitation of the potentiation is summarised in Table 1. Discussion These experiments show that arterioles of the guinea-pig intestinal submucosa express NPY Y2 receptors in addition to the Yj receptors described previously (Xia et al, 1992). These Y2 receptors mediate a reduction of the constriction caused by high K+, a constriction that is due entirely to depolarization of the smooth muscle and subsequent entry of Ca21 through depolarization-activated channels.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
“…These Y2 receptors mediate a reduction of the constriction caused by high K+, a constriction that is due entirely to depolarization of the smooth muscle and subsequent entry of Ca21 through depolarization-activated channels. We have previously shown that responses to noradrenaline, which rely mainly on Ca2+ release from the internal stores, are not affected by one of the Y2-selective agonists used here, PYY-(13-36) (Xia et al, 1992). We therefore suggest that there are Y2 receptors on the smooth muscle which modulate the opening of voltage-sensitive Ca2+ channels, as they do in nerve terminals (Foucart et al, 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations