2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9544-2_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Non-plastic Fines on Liquefaction Resistance of Sandy Soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One can also observe that the clean sand curve is crossed by the 15% silty sand curve around D r of 45%, which adds complexity to the FC's effect on liquefaction resistance. Similar crossings of (CRR) N=20 curves for different silty sands could be seen in literature [5,18], as well as discussed in detail by Tutuncu et al [75].…”
Section: Effect Of Fines and Relative Density On Crrsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One can also observe that the clean sand curve is crossed by the 15% silty sand curve around D r of 45%, which adds complexity to the FC's effect on liquefaction resistance. Similar crossings of (CRR) N=20 curves for different silty sands could be seen in literature [5,18], as well as discussed in detail by Tutuncu et al [75].…”
Section: Effect Of Fines and Relative Density On Crrsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…7b-and there is a linear relationship between (CRR) N=20 and D r for the studied range. In several previous studies, such linear relationships have also been observed for other soils [18,74,75].…”
Section: Effect Of Fines and Relative Density On Crrsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accordingly, (CRR) N = 20 increases linearly with D r for clean and silty sands tested in this experimental study. Several researchers (e.g., 48,49 ) have also observed a linear relationship between CRR and D r for other types of soils. Moreover, at a given D r value, the liquefaction resistance of silty sand with FC = 5% increased its cyclic strength compared to clean sand.…”
Section: Crr Determination From Cdss Testmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Many conventional studies in both theoretical and experimental methods have been conducted to evaluate the liquefaction behavior of soil‐foundation systems. The numerical approach is mostly based on an input data analysis using theory models of soil elements such as the multispring and glass cocktail models suggested by Iai et al and the stress density model suggested by Cubrinovski et al However, these methods have partly explored the behavior of foundations during liquefaction. For example, Trung et al investigated the seismic behavior of stayed cable bridge foundations during liquefaction using a shaking table test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%