2020
DOI: 10.22358/jafs/127692/2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of on-farm supplemental feeding of probiotic <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> on milk production in lactating dairy cows under tropical conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
5
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, we can assume that the inclusion of multicomponent synbiotic “Kormomix® Rumin” had no impact on milk productivity parameters compared with the control group. Our results come in the opposite direction from those obtained by ( 27 ), who reported that milk yield increased in response to supplementation of B. subtilis . They mentioned that cows fed 2 × 10 11 CFU of B. subtilis daily produced 1.7 kg more milk than the control group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, we can assume that the inclusion of multicomponent synbiotic “Kormomix® Rumin” had no impact on milk productivity parameters compared with the control group. Our results come in the opposite direction from those obtained by ( 27 ), who reported that milk yield increased in response to supplementation of B. subtilis . They mentioned that cows fed 2 × 10 11 CFU of B. subtilis daily produced 1.7 kg more milk than the control group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we conclude that the inclusion of multicomponent synbiotic “Kormomix® Rumin” in diets of Russian Holstein dairy cows, in general, did not deteriorate the blood characteristics. Our results match those obtained by ( 27 ); they mentioned that hematological and biochemical parameters did not vary between dairy cows fed different treatments of B. subtilis .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Bacillus -based DFMs are already in use in several monogastric animal species, with positive impacts on nutrient absorption and in immune response ascribed to the alteration of the microbial ecology in the digestive tract [ 17 , 18 ]. B. subtilis -based DFM have also been applied to dairy cattle, in which they consistently exerted a positive influence on ruminal fermentation, growth, lactation performance, and milk composition [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. Yet, the bacterial functions that are at the basis of such beneficial effect still await elucidation [ 9 , 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This species, listed in the Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS) recommended microorganisms intentionally added to food or feed (EFSA BIOHAZ Panel, 2022, 2023a, 2023b), was shown to colonize the gastrointestinal tract of mammals and poultry, in the form of vegetative cells (spores) or forming biofilms, thereby acting as probiotic (Bernardeau et al, 2017; Lee et al, 2019; Mun at al., 2021). In particular, B. subtilis spores added to dairy cattle feed consistently exerted a positive influence on ruminal fermentation, growth, lactation performance, and milk composition (Sun et al, 2011; Sun et al, 2013; Sun et al, 2016; Souza et al, 2017; Choonkham et al, 2020; Wang et al, 2022; Jia et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%