2004
DOI: 10.1081/css-120029724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Organic and Plant Residue Quality and Orchard Management Practices on Decomposition Rates of Residues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We selected bark mulch for this study thinking that it might increase the duration and decrease the costs that are problematic with mulch GMSs. Hardwood bark is inherently resistant to decomposition, locally available in much of the northeastern United States, and persists longer than other biomass mulches such as hay-straw or grass clippings (Goh and Tutua, 2004;Whitford et al, 1989;Yao et al, 2005). During the initial years of our study, nutrient release from the bark mulch did not increase soil nutrient availability compared with the other GMS treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…We selected bark mulch for this study thinking that it might increase the duration and decrease the costs that are problematic with mulch GMSs. Hardwood bark is inherently resistant to decomposition, locally available in much of the northeastern United States, and persists longer than other biomass mulches such as hay-straw or grass clippings (Goh and Tutua, 2004;Whitford et al, 1989;Yao et al, 2005). During the initial years of our study, nutrient release from the bark mulch did not increase soil nutrient availability compared with the other GMS treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…It is documented that plant parts differ in their fiber content and rate of decomposition (Quemada and Cabrera, 1995; Palm and Rowland, 1997). The structural components of straw are found in different proportions depending on crop species (Goh and Tutuna, 2004; Hadas et al, 2004), and likewise, different portions of straw (soluble carbohydrates, cellulose, lignin) break down at different rates, affecting the availability of C and N as residue decomposes (Hadas et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no single indicator of straw quality that can predict residue decomposition in soil (Giller and Cadisch, 1997; Kumar and Goh, 2000). The structural components of residue, C and N content, and C/N ratio are known to be indicators of residue decomposition and N mineralization (Baggie et al, 2004; Goh and Tutuna, 2004). High hemicellulose is linked to rapid decomposition and high lignin content, high C/N ratio, and low total N are associated with slower breakdown (Wagner and Wolf, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decomposition of residues generally follow 1st order kinetics where the rate of transformation of a substrate (i.e., the residue) is proportional to the substrate concentration (Minderman 1968). However, within agro-ecosystems many biotic and abiotic factors can affect decomposition rates and subsequent N min including microbial activity and carbon use efficiency (CUE), biochemical composition of residues, edaphic soil properties, environmental conditions and management practices such as inputs and tillage (Baggie et al 2004;Cambardella and Elliott 1993;Goh and Tutuna 2004;Johnson et al 2007;Robertson and Groffman 2007). Greater knowledge in this area will assist agricultural professionals become more efficient nutrient managers by adopting and tailoring cover crop management practices to meet farm and environmental stewardship goals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%