2008
DOI: 10.1021/es800951h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Organic Carbon Supply Rates on Uranium Mobility in a Previously Bioreduced Contaminated Sediment

Abstract: Bioreduction-based strategies for remediating uranium (U)-contaminated sediments face the challenge of maintaining the reduced status of U for long times. Because groundwater influxes continuously bring in oxidizing terminal electron acceptors (O 2 , NO 3 -

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and Geobacter spp. (16,55) decreased from their initial 1.51% and 0.33%, respectively, to an average of 0.13% and 0.14%, respectively. It was instead the less-studied Pelosinus spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…and Geobacter spp. (16,55) decreased from their initial 1.51% and 0.33%, respectively, to an average of 0.13% and 0.14%, respectively. It was instead the less-studied Pelosinus spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Great efforts were made to determine the feasibility and robustness of this technology in the ensuing years (Wall & Krumholz, 2006). However, data began to accumulate showing that exhaustion of electron donors used to stimulate microbes capable of U(IV) production would often result in resolubilization of uranium as U(VI) (Anderson Senko, Istok, Suflita, & Krumholz, 2002;Wan et al, 2008;Zhong et al, 2005). Two possible explanations, not mutually exclusive, were given: exhaustion of the electron donor could allow dissolved oxygen access to the reduced uranium and abiotic oxidation could occur or, second, the microbes responsible for the reduction would now be limited for electron donor sources and turn to U(IV) for electrons.…”
Section: Uranium Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biologically precipitated nanocrystals UO 2 are especially vulnerable to reoxidation (Singer et al, 2007), and can be oxidized by ferrihydrite, with concomitant production of uranyl and Fe(II) (Ginder-Vogel et al, 2010). Reoxidation could be limited by long-term injection of organic carbon; however, even under these conditions, uranium mobilization has been shown to increase with time, owing to enhanced microbial respiration and increasing carbonate/bicarbonate concentrations (Wan et al, 2008). Finally, Senko et al (2002) showed that the biogenic intermediates of dissimilatory nitrate reduction, including nitrite, nitrous oxide, and nitric oxide, can reoxidize and mobilize U(IV), raising questions about the long-term effectiveness of bioremediation even if the system remains anaerobic.…”
Section: Environmental Distribution Of Uraniummentioning
confidence: 99%