1960
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of phenol on nervous conduction

Abstract: In therapeutics phenol has been used dissolved in glycerol as ear-drops and as an ointment to stop itching; it has also been used in aqueous solution to destroy nerve fibres, such as those of the sympathetic chain and those growing in an amputation neuroma. A further use for phenol was introduced by Maher (1955). He reported that the chronic and severe pain occurring in some cases of cancer could be relieved by the intrathecal injection of phenol dissolved in glycerol; later (1957) he used phenol dissolved in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

1961
1961
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To minimize these possibilities we chose, therefore, to block neural conduction in the hilum by stripping the adventitia of the renal artery while exposing it to phenol for at least 20 min. Phenol is known to produce an irreversible blockage of nerve conduction if exposure of neural tissues to the agent is sufficiently prolonged (18). It rupted neural traffic completely or that those branches of the renal nerves not exposed to the phenol were few and/or of relatively minor importance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To minimize these possibilities we chose, therefore, to block neural conduction in the hilum by stripping the adventitia of the renal artery while exposing it to phenol for at least 20 min. Phenol is known to produce an irreversible blockage of nerve conduction if exposure of neural tissues to the agent is sufficiently prolonged (18). It rupted neural traffic completely or that those branches of the renal nerves not exposed to the phenol were few and/or of relatively minor importance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All experiments were performed under the same conditions as those previously used for investigating the differential action of local anaesthetics; these methods were described in our previous papers (Nathan & Sears, 1960a, 1961. The experiments were performed on seventeen cats anaesthetized with Nembutal (Pentobarbitone, Abbott Laboratories; 35-40 mg/kg), given by intraperitoneal injection.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these methods yield a reversible block, e.g. by electrical polarization (for a survey of literature see Sassen & Zimmermann, 1973;Fukushima, Yahara & Kato, 1975), by cooling (see Douglas & Malcolm, 1955;Franz & Iggo, 1968), by local pressure and/or ischaemia (Gasser & Erlanger, 1929;Clark, Hughes & Gasser, 1935), by local anaesthetics (Gasser & Erlanger, 1929;Nathan & Sears, 1961;Heavner & De Jong, 1973), by hyper-or hypotonic solutions (Nathan & Sears, 1962;Jewett & King, 1971; King, Jewett & Sundberg, 1972), or by phenol (Nathan & Sears, 1960;Iggo & Walsh, 1960;Wood, 1978). These reversible blocks were in most cases preferential for the 0022 (A,8) fibres, with the exception of the local anaesthetics and phenol which blocked non-myelinated (C) fibres first.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%