2017
DOI: 10.1017/pls.2017.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of physical attractiveness on political beliefs

Abstract: Physical attractiveness is an important social factor in our daily interactions. Scholars in social psychology provide evidence that attractiveness stereotypes and the "halo effect" are prominent in affecting the traits we attribute to others. However, the interest in attractiveness has not directly filtered down to questions of political behavior beyond candidates and elites. Utilizing measures of attractiveness across multiple surveys, we examine the relationship between attractiveness and political beliefs.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results suggest that preferences for redistribution are channeled through party affiliation. Moreover, our findings are in line with studies showing a relationship between beauty or height and conservative voting (Arunachalam and Watson, 2018;Peterson and Palmer, 2017).…”
Section: Beauty and Party Affiliationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our results suggest that preferences for redistribution are channeled through party affiliation. Moreover, our findings are in line with studies showing a relationship between beauty or height and conservative voting (Arunachalam and Watson, 2018;Peterson and Palmer, 2017).…”
Section: Beauty and Party Affiliationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This effect was moderated by sex, such that there was a moderate effect among female judges and no effect among males. One possible explanation is that Republicans simply look more robust than Democrats in general (Peterson & Palmer, 2017;Rule & Ambady, 2010;Sell, Hone, & Pound, 2012), but this argument cannot account for the moderating effect of sex. The party difference in facial robustness among female, but not male, judges suggests that Republican presidents select female judges on the basis of appearance to a greater extent than Democratic presidents do, or perhaps have different appearance preferences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Political ideology was measured by two questions: “When it comes to social (fiscal) issues, which of the following would best describe you?” Responses were on a 5 point Likert scale from −2 very liberal to +2 very conservative. 24 Both questions were used independently in the analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%