1991
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.60.1.138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of physical threat and ego threat on eating behavior.

Abstract: Restrained and unrestrained subjects were subjected to one of three distress manipulations prior to an ad lib taste task. The physical fear threat (anticipated electric shock) significantly decreased unrestrained subjects' eating and slightly increased restrained subjects' eating. Both ego threats (failure at an easy task or anticipating having to give a speech in front of an evaluative audience) significantly increased restrained subjects' eating but did not significantly suppress unrestrained subjects' eatin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
218
1
17

Year Published

1993
1993
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 317 publications
(249 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
13
218
1
17
Order By: Relevance
“…high self-esteem dieters ate at an intermediate level and were unaffected by the preload manipulation (Polivy, et al, 1988). Similarly, low self-esteem dieters are likely to over eat when their self-esteem is threatened, whereas high self-esteem dieters are less affected by such egehreats (Heatherton, Herman, & Polivy, 1991). In these instances, the low self-esteem dieter shows extremely poor self-regulation.…”
Section: Dieting Self-regulation and Self-esteemmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…high self-esteem dieters ate at an intermediate level and were unaffected by the preload manipulation (Polivy, et al, 1988). Similarly, low self-esteem dieters are likely to over eat when their self-esteem is threatened, whereas high self-esteem dieters are less affected by such egehreats (Heatherton, Herman, & Polivy, 1991). In these instances, the low self-esteem dieter shows extremely poor self-regulation.…”
Section: Dieting Self-regulation and Self-esteemmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Physical threats that would produce physical discomfort, decrease eating in restrained adults, whereas ego-related stressors such as task failure and anticipation of giving a speech increase eating in restrained eaters (6,15). As demonstrated by several groups (6,16), interpersonal stressors may be especially powerful for increasing eating in restrained eaters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Task-induced depression 15,16 and fear [17][18][19] both increased food intake in restrained eaters while decreasing or not changing the eating of unrestrained participants. This methodology, in which highly palatable snack foods are presented during or immediately after mood induction, has great potential for exploring the antecedents of binge eating.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%