1994
DOI: 10.1207/s15374424jccp2304_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of poverty and quality of the home environment on changes in the academic and behavioral adjustment of elementary school-age children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
70
1
4

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
70
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a decline was observed previously for infants raised in low-income families and communities, independent of chemical exposures, 37,55,56 in part because toddlers from low-income homes have less access to developmentally stimulating environments and may be delayed in acquiring language and problem-solving skills. [57][58][59][60][61][62][63] Although children with low HOME scores did have significantly lower BSID-II scores in this study, there was no indication that the chlorpyrifos effects were either exacerbated or remediated by the quality of the home environment. The finding that a large proportion of children scored in the delayed range on the MDI, although consistent with other reports for similar populations, 64,65 is worrisome, especially because the MDI is often given more importance than the PDI.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Such a decline was observed previously for infants raised in low-income families and communities, independent of chemical exposures, 37,55,56 in part because toddlers from low-income homes have less access to developmentally stimulating environments and may be delayed in acquiring language and problem-solving skills. [57][58][59][60][61][62][63] Although children with low HOME scores did have significantly lower BSID-II scores in this study, there was no indication that the chlorpyrifos effects were either exacerbated or remediated by the quality of the home environment. The finding that a large proportion of children scored in the delayed range on the MDI, although consistent with other reports for similar populations, 64,65 is worrisome, especially because the MDI is often given more importance than the PDI.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…To explore the issue of communication valence further, the subscores of expression of positive and negative affect were examined separately for their unique variance. In most equations, both scores contributed about equally to the outcomes of teacher ratings of behavior and math achievement, indicating no differential effect The effects of the quality of the home environment are in accord with those of others (Dubow & Ippolito, 1994;Duncan et al, 1994;Elardo & Bradley, 1981), indicating that both the nature of the physical environment as well as the provision of materials, books, and space for child activity play a significant role in the child's well-being and have effects that cannot be accounted for by social class alone.The exploratory analyses to examine gender as a possible moderator of the relations between risk factors and outcomes suggest that neighborhood context may influence the functioning of boys and girls differently. It appears that for both parent and teacher ratings of externalizing difficulties, gender significantly moderates the impact, with neighborhood effects being strongly significant for boys and absent for girls.…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Some factors that constitute the cumulative risk index, such as poverty, might affect effortful control through the quality of the home environment or learning opportunities in the home (e.g., Elardo & Bradley, 1981;Dubow & Ippolito, 1994;Duncan et al, 1994). Other factors, such as singleparent status or parental psychopathology, might impact developing effortful control through parenting (e.g., Dumka et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%