2013
DOI: 10.1080/15248372.2011.638689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Presentation Format and List Length on Children's False Memories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The modeling analyses revealed that the familiarity parameter was larger for categories for which larger numbers of exemplars were presented, implicating the gist retrieval in the false memory enhancement for 8-exemplar categories. These findings are inconsistent with prior work on DRM false memory (e.g., Robinson & Roediger, 1997; Swannell & Dewhurst, 2013), which showed that increasing the length of word lists increases false memory and reduces true memory. However, the present data are consistent with research on categorized word lists, which showed that increasing list length increases false memory without affecting true memory (Dennis & Chapman, 2010).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The modeling analyses revealed that the familiarity parameter was larger for categories for which larger numbers of exemplars were presented, implicating the gist retrieval in the false memory enhancement for 8-exemplar categories. These findings are inconsistent with prior work on DRM false memory (e.g., Robinson & Roediger, 1997; Swannell & Dewhurst, 2013), which showed that increasing the length of word lists increases false memory and reduces true memory. However, the present data are consistent with research on categorized word lists, which showed that increasing list length increases false memory without affecting true memory (Dennis & Chapman, 2010).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies in the DRM literature typically showed 8 to 15 words per list (e.g., Fenn et al, 2009;Swannell & Dewhurst, 2013). Generally, within this range,…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Prior studies in the DRM literature typically showed 8-15 words per list (e.g. [32,64,86]). Generally, within this range, showing fewer words reduces false recall rates ( [68,86]; see also [87]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32,64,86]). Generally, within this range, showing fewer words reduces false recall rates ( [68,86]; see also [87]). However, showing even fewer words per list (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%