SummaryEstimated energy requirements (EERs) are important for sports based on body weight classifications to aid in weight management. The basis for establishing EERs varies and includes self-reported energy intake (EI), predicted energy expenditure, and measured daily energy expenditure. Currently, however, no studies have been performed with male wrestlers using the highly accurate and precise doubly labeled water (DLW) method to estimate energy and fluid requirement. The primary aim of this study was to compare total energy expenditure (TEE), self-reported EI, and the difference in collegiate wrestlers during a normal training period using the DLW method. The secondary aims were to measure the water turnover and the physical activity level (PAL) of the athletes, and to examine the accuracy of two currently used equations to predict EER. Ten healthy males (age, 20.460.5 y) belonging to the East-Japan college league participated in this study. TEE was measured using the DLW method, and EI was assessed with self-reported dietary records for ~1 wk. There was a significant difference between TEE (17.962. . The measured PAL (2.660.3) was higher than two predicted values during the training season and thus the two EER prediction equations produced underestimated values relative to DLW. We found that previous EERs were underestimating requirements in collegiate wrestlers and that those estimates should be revised. Key Words doubly labeled water, wrestler, total energy expenditure, energy intake, water turnoverThe sport of wrestling is an individual combat Olympic sport that is practiced all over the world. It is a weight-class sport and as elite athletes are involved in daily training and competition, it is essential to determine their energy and water requirements to aid in maintaining optimal weight (1-4). Other sports based on body-weight classification similar to wrestling, such as judo and boxing, also need accurate measures of requirements to establish an energy-and-water-intake plan to accomplish athletes' target body weight for matches (5-8). The doubly labeled water (DLW) method has been proposed as a criterion method to estimate energy requirement (EER) because it is an accurate and objective method for measuring total energy expenditure (TEE) and water turnover for field athlete studies in free-living conditions with minimum constraints (9, 10). Because of its lower cost, self-reported energy intake (EI) has been commonly used to estimate EER for athletes; however, the self-reported EI measurement has been shown to underestimate EI compared with measured TEE (11). For example, among non-athletes, comparison of self-reported EI with DLW-derived TEE demonstrated that over one-third of individuals underreport EI by more than 25% when using the DLW method in several different population groups (12). The underestimation of EI has also been found in athletes, and the range of error has been reported to be between 0 and 243% (13). Errors in this range plague EI planning for some athletes, because an inadequate ...