2004
DOI: 10.1614/wt-03-125r1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Repeat Annual Applications of Dichlobenil on Weed Populations and Yield Components of Cranberry

Abstract: To address grower concerns that repeated use of dichlobenil could negatively affect cranberry productivity, field studies were conducted at two commercial farms in either high weed density (HW) or low weed density (LW) areas. Data from 4 yr of repeat annual applications of 0, 1.8, and 4.5 kg ai/ha dichlobenil indicated minimal negative impact on cranberry vines. Herbicide application did not affect upright productivity, leaf biomass production, percent fruit set, or other yield parameters adversely; in additio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No negative yield effects were seen, but longer studies are needed to make appropriate assessments relating to yield. Four repeat, annual applications of dichlobenil made in mid-May for dodder management to EB and H cranberries did not show deleterious effects (Sandler et al 2004) and support the visual observations noted in this study relative for these two varieties. However, data are needed to appropriately gauge other cranberry-vine responses (e.g., number of healthy buds, upright density) to repeated late-May through June applications of dichlobenil for common varieties.…”
Section: Varietysupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No negative yield effects were seen, but longer studies are needed to make appropriate assessments relating to yield. Four repeat, annual applications of dichlobenil made in mid-May for dodder management to EB and H cranberries did not show deleterious effects (Sandler et al 2004) and support the visual observations noted in this study relative for these two varieties. However, data are needed to appropriately gauge other cranberry-vine responses (e.g., number of healthy buds, upright density) to repeated late-May through June applications of dichlobenil for common varieties.…”
Section: Varietysupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Because dodder infestations depress cranberry yield (Bewick et al 1988;Devlin and Deubert 1980), sites expected to be devoid of dodder infestations in the treatment year were specifically chosen to permit evaluation of dichlobenil on yield without the confounding factor of dodder-induced yield loss. Dichlobenil was applied using a hand-held shaker (Sandler et al 2004) to 2-m 2 plots arranged in a randomized completeblock design with five replicates; alleyways of at least 0.25 m separated each plot. Treatments (growth stage by rate combinations, n ¼ 12; plus an untreated control) were made as single applications on a weekly schedule, starting in early May and continuing to mid to late June for each variety (Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our estimates of N and C pools in soil OM (0-15 cm beneath the soil surface) exceeded vegetative biomass pools, but the decrease in belowground biomass C from 2004 to 2005 may have been caused by an herbicide application of Casaron (Dichlobenil), which can reduce cranberry root growth (Sandler et al 2004). Overall, these data provide evidence that this perennial cropping system can be characterized by high levels of nutrient retention and potential recycling of both C and N from the OM.…”
Section: Nutrient Retention and Recycling Of N From Ommentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Anecdotal observations indicate that dichobenil applications do not substantially decrease dodder seed production unless the majority of seedlings are controlled. Repeated annual dichobenil applications do not impact yield of cranberry [54].…”
Section: Preemergence Optionsmentioning
confidence: 90%