1990
DOI: 10.1538/expanim1978.39.3_361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Repeated Chair Restraint on Physiological Values in the Rhesus Monkey (<I>Macaca mulatta</I>)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Tatsumi et al. reported a slight increase in serum AST at the beginning of 8‐hour monkey‐chair restraint, and concluded its increase to have been derived from muscle activity consequent to excitement during the restraint [34]. In our present study, however, AST did not change throughout the experiment, nor did ALT.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Tatsumi et al. reported a slight increase in serum AST at the beginning of 8‐hour monkey‐chair restraint, and concluded its increase to have been derived from muscle activity consequent to excitement during the restraint [34]. In our present study, however, AST did not change throughout the experiment, nor did ALT.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…AST in the blood is mainly derived from heart, liver, and muscle; whereas ALT is derived from the liver. Tatsumi et al reported a slight increase in serum AST at the beginning of 8-hour monkey-chair restraint, and concluded its increase to have been derived from muscle activity consequent to excitement during the restraint [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study estimated pulse rates were in the range of 95-125 BPM for monkey Sun, 125-150 BPM for Fla and 160-230 BPM for Mag, which agrees with previously reported values of heart rate (120-250 BPM) for rhesus monkeys sitting in a primate chair [2,[33][34][35]. Performance of our method for pulse rate estimation (Table 4) was only slightly worse than those reported for humans: mean absolute error obtained in [70] was 2.5 BPM; fraction of epochs with error below 6 BPM (about 8% of average human pulse rate) for the best method considered in [71] was achieved for 87% of epochs; reported values of the Pearson correlation coefficient vary from 0.87 in [71] to 1.00 in [25].…”
Section: Pulse Rate Estimationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…To estimate pulse rate from iPPG (videoPR) we computed the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) of iPPG signal in sliding overlapping windows; for each window pulse rate is estimated by the frequency with highest amplitude in the heart-rate bandwidth, which is 90-300 BPM (1.5-5 Hz) for rhesus monkeys [2,[33][34][35]. This approach is commonly used for human iPPG [22,24,25], so we applied it here to make our results comparable.…”
Section: Materials and Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%