2017
DOI: 10.1007/s40279-017-0788-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Rest Interval Duration in Resistance Training on Measures of Muscular Strength: A Systematic Review

Abstract: The current literature shows that robust gains in muscular strength can be achieved even with short RIs (< 60 s). However, it seems that longer duration RIs (> 2 min) are required to maximize strength gains in resistance-trained individuals. With regard to untrained individuals, it seems that short to moderate RIs (60-120 s) are sufficient for maximizing muscular strength gains.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
87
0
8

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
87
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The standard checklist has 27 items, which refer to: reporting (items 1-10); external validity (items 11-13); internal validity (items 14-26); and statistical power (item 27). However, given the specificity of included studies (i.e., exercise interventions), we added two items that refer to reporting of compliance (item 28) and supervision of the exercise programs (item 29), as done by others [29][30][31]. With the adjusted checklist, the maximum score was 29 points.…”
Section: Methodological Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The standard checklist has 27 items, which refer to: reporting (items 1-10); external validity (items 11-13); internal validity (items 14-26); and statistical power (item 27). However, given the specificity of included studies (i.e., exercise interventions), we added two items that refer to reporting of compliance (item 28) and supervision of the exercise programs (item 29), as done by others [29][30][31]. With the adjusted checklist, the maximum score was 29 points.…”
Section: Methodological Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the adjusted checklist, the maximum score was 29 points. The following classification was used for scoring the studies: (1) good methodological quality (>20 points); (2) moderate methodological quality (11-20 points); and (3) poor methodological quality (<11 points) [29][30][31]. Two authors (JG and FS), independently performed the quality assessment, and any observed differences were resolved via discussion and agreement.…”
Section: Methodological Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rest interval can be operationally defined as the time taken between sets. Traditionally, rest intervals are spent passively (i.e., without any additional physical activity) and therefore, most of the current recommendations for rest intervals exclusively focus on its optimal duration (American College of Sports Medicine, 2009;Grgic et al, 2018). Mohamad et al (2012) highlighted that in an RT session comprising six to eight exercises performed for three to four sets with a rest interval of 60-90 s, the total amount of time spent in rest is ∼24-40 min per session.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mitochondria not only generate energy for cells but also induce oxidative stress and apoptosis if ROS accumulation; hence cells develop multiple mechanisms to maintain the mitochondrial OXPHOS [9]. OXPHOS within mitochondria is an important metabolic process whereby electrons are transferred through the electron transport chain across the inner mitochondrial membrane to reduce oxygen into water.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%