2013
DOI: 10.15842/kjcp.2013.32.1.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of reward magnitude on the performance of delayed discounting task: focusing on smoking and drinking behaviors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The temporal discounting task was used to measure the delay of gratification ability with respect to hypothetical amounts of money. [40][41][42][43] Previous studies using hypothetical reward produced results comparable with outcomes using real monetary amounts. 44,45 In this study, we used the temporal discounting task applying a double-limits algorithm.…”
Section: Temporal Discounting Taskmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The temporal discounting task was used to measure the delay of gratification ability with respect to hypothetical amounts of money. [40][41][42][43] Previous studies using hypothetical reward produced results comparable with outcomes using real monetary amounts. 44,45 In this study, we used the temporal discounting task applying a double-limits algorithm.…”
Section: Temporal Discounting Taskmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Choices were between a variable immediate amount (< 100,000 won; worth approximately $100) or 100,000 won (worth approximately $100) with six delays (a week, 3 weeks, 2 months, 5 months, 9 months, and 18 months). 42,43 Both immediate and delayed amounts were presented together and the participants selected the left or right option in the slide using keys on the keyboard. If participants preferred the left side option, they pressed the 1 key and if they preferred the right-side option, they pressed the 2 key.…”
Section: Temporal Discounting Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%