2016
DOI: 10.1111/jasp.12371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of role model exposure on STEM and non‐STEM student engagement

Abstract: Studies examining factors (e.g., STEM stereotypes) that underlie the recruitment and retention of STEM students are critical as the demand for STEM professionals is rapidly increasing. This experimental study tested the effects of role model biographies that challenge common STEM stereotypes (i.e., STEM is for gifted individuals and for European American males) on 1035 STEM and non-STEM undergraduate students. Findings showed that role model exposure had positive effects on both STEM and non-STEM students' int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
156
0
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
5
156
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather than changing stereotypes, positive experiences may help to act as a buffer for girls against negative effects of strong stereotypes about their ability (Stout, Dasgupta, Hunsinger, & McManus, 2011). Other types of experiences, such as watching a female role model succeed at and enjoy programming robots, may be more likely to change children's stereotypes (Galdi et al, 2014;Shin et al, 2016).…”
Section: Technology-gender Stereotypesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Rather than changing stereotypes, positive experiences may help to act as a buffer for girls against negative effects of strong stereotypes about their ability (Stout, Dasgupta, Hunsinger, & McManus, 2011). Other types of experiences, such as watching a female role model succeed at and enjoy programming robots, may be more likely to change children's stereotypes (Galdi et al, 2014;Shin et al, 2016).…”
Section: Technology-gender Stereotypesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Given the various social risks for high-achieving students and in particular that they might be stereotyped or labelled as nerds, geeks, etc. (e.g., Händel et al, 2013;Person, 2010: Peterson, 2009) one might wonder if they perceive a student of similar achievement with skepticism or if this student is rather seen as a potential model that confirms the adequacy of their own achievement behavior (Lee, 2002;Shin et al, 2016;Stopper, 2000). In response to this question, as a first result we can report: High achieving students in all countries participating in the study ascribe positive attributes to a new high-achieving student such as high intellectual abilities and social qualities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, a crucial role might be played by peers. They serve various functions in the development of the gifted, in particular regarding competition, support, motivation, and role modeling (Lee, 2002).Given the fact that peer models can be extremely important at all stages of academia to high ability students and as choosing the wrong role models can be a contributing factor to underachievement (Baker; Bridger, & Evans, 1998/2011Händel, Vialle, & Ziegler, 2013;Shin, Levy, & London, 2016;Stopper, 2000) this raises the question of how high achieving students perceive other high-achieving students. Indeed, it can be argued that high-achieving students benefit most from classroom interactions with students of similar achievement levels (Fiedler, et al, 1993;Peterson, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Shin et al. ). The types of students who get these opportunities, thus, strongly determine who is recruited into graduate school in ecology.…”
Section: Dissolving Barriers To Engagement In Ecologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implicit biases are a barrier to recruiting and retaining people of underrepresented groups at all career stages. For high school and undergraduate students, exposure to relatable role models and gaining research experience are key determinants of whether students choose to pursue ecology careers (Armstrong et al 2007, Shin et al 2016. The types of students who get these opportunities, thus, strongly determine who is recruited into graduate school in ecology.…”
Section: Barriersmentioning
confidence: 99%