2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-015-5041-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of root water uptake formulation on simulated water and energy budgets at local and basin scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of studies using water isotopic tracers (Dawson & Pate, 1996;Zhang et al, 2017) and root excavations (Fan et al, 2017) have observed that maximum rooting depths often track the water table depth suggesting plants actively subsidize their water demands with older and deeper water pools. These observations support modeling results, which indicate that in order to accurately capture spatial patterns in transpiration and the response of terrestrial ecosystems to precipitation variability, it is imperative to account for precipitation from previous seasons or years (Ferguson et al, 2016;Maxwell & Condon, 2016;Maxwell et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…A number of studies using water isotopic tracers (Dawson & Pate, 1996;Zhang et al, 2017) and root excavations (Fan et al, 2017) have observed that maximum rooting depths often track the water table depth suggesting plants actively subsidize their water demands with older and deeper water pools. These observations support modeling results, which indicate that in order to accurately capture spatial patterns in transpiration and the response of terrestrial ecosystems to precipitation variability, it is imperative to account for precipitation from previous seasons or years (Ferguson et al, 2016;Maxwell & Condon, 2016;Maxwell et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…PF simultaneously solves the 3D Richards equation and shallow water equations to determine a pressure head in every cell (Kollet & Maxwell, 2006;Maxwell, 2013). CLM solves the surface energy budget, explicitly representing evaporation, transpiration, snow processes, heat fluxes, and radiation partitioning (Ferguson, Jefferson, Maxwell, & Kollet, 2016;Jefferson, Gilbert, Constantine, & Maxwell, 2015b;Jefferson & Maxwell, 2015). CLM and PF are connected across four subsurface layers to represent rooting depths and lateral water transfer in the variably saturated subsurface (Maxwell & Miller, 2005).…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameters that are used to determine leaf area index, reflectance and transmittance and root distributions vary by land-cover type and are provided as inputs to the model using the 18 land-cover classes defined by the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP). For additional details on the numerical approach and analysis on the sensitivity of evaporation and transpiration within the CLM the reader is referred to Ferguson et al (2016) Jefferson and Maxwell (2015), Kollet and Maxwell (2008) and .…”
Section: Hydrologic Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%