2018
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.13327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity analysis of hydraulic conductivity and Manning's n parameters lead to new method to scale effective hydraulic conductivity across model resolutions

Abstract: Hydrological modelling is an important tool for research, policy, and management, but uncertainty remains about parameters transferability from field observations made at small scale to models at the catchment scale and larger. This uncertainty compels the need to develop parameter relationships that are translatable across scale. In this study, we compare the changes to modelled processes as resolution is coarsened from 100‐m to 1‐km in a topographically complex, 255‐km2 Colorado River headwater catchment. We… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
50
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
5
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While changing K by two orders of magnitude, simulated flows from two scaled cases are marginally different in magnitude from the original case. Indeed, flows in the two cases behave similarly as observed by Foster and Maxwell (). When K was decreased by one order of magnitude, we see lower baseflow and higher peak flow compared to the baseline simulation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While changing K by two orders of magnitude, simulated flows from two scaled cases are marginally different in magnitude from the original case. Indeed, flows in the two cases behave similarly as observed by Foster and Maxwell (). When K was decreased by one order of magnitude, we see lower baseflow and higher peak flow compared to the baseline simulation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Therefore, in addition to the lateral and no lateral simulations we also evaluate the sensitivity of our findings to the K value used. Foster and Maxwell () scaled K over two orders of magnitude for three respective layers of a ParFlow‐CLM model of the East River in Colorado, namely soils, geology and basement layers. They concluded that model outflows are most sensitive to K changes in the geology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…we have not yet compensated by changing other parameters. Recently a method has been proposed to improve these issues by 484 scaling horizontal hydraulic conductivity (Foster and Maxwell, 2019).…”
Section: Representation Of Rivers and Surface Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we use a heuristic approach of simple averages to bound the expected range of upscaled vertical K S , where the arithmetic and harmonic mean (K arith and K harm ) are the upper and lower bounds, respectively, and the geometric mean (K geom ) is an intermediate value. K arith and K harm are typically used to approximate groundwater flow parallel and perpendicular to layering, respectively, in anisotropic systems (Freeze and Cherry, 1979). This concept has been generally been extended to variably-saturated flow (Mualem, 1984;Assouline and Or, 2006).…”
Section: Site Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contaminant transport community has long recognized the strong influence of K scaling and geologic heterogeneity on transport processes (e.g., Gelhar et al, 1992;Sudicky and Huyakorn, 1991;Koltermann and Gorelick, 1996), and recent work has extended these concepts to assess their role on runoff generation, evapotranspiration (ET), and feedbacks between subsurface and land-surface water in integrated hydrologic models (Srivastava et al, 2014;Gilbert et al, 2016;Foster and Maxwell, 2019), but relatively little research has focused on the influence these factors for MAR processes specifically. Recent work has 2 https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2019-412 Preprint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%