2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of selenium source and level of supplementation on the performance and meat quality of lambs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

18
85
4
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
18
85
4
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Values were lower than those reported by Vignola et al (2009) in lambs who obtained a pH 6.21 and 6.18, for 0.3 ppm and 0.45 ppm Se yeast. Komprda et al (2012) reported that a pH for lambs at 24 h after slaughtering ranged between 5.8-5.74; however, Kuchtík et al (2012) reported a range of 5.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Values were lower than those reported by Vignola et al (2009) in lambs who obtained a pH 6.21 and 6.18, for 0.3 ppm and 0.45 ppm Se yeast. Komprda et al (2012) reported that a pH for lambs at 24 h after slaughtering ranged between 5.8-5.74; however, Kuchtík et al (2012) reported a range of 5.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…Vignola et al (2009) reported that neither level of Se supplementation or source (0.30 ppm sodium selenite or 0.30, 0.45 ppm Se yeast) influenced L* color meat; however, Ripoll et al (2011) used 0.3 ppm of sodium selenite and found that L* increased during storage time, which may be due to that they conducted their research until 13 days and reported this change at 7 days while in our study we included only 8 days, and reported an increased L* value without significant difference among days.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beef is a major source of dietary selenium for humans (Zhang et al, 2010) and the result of the present study indicated that the prolonged supplementation with organic Se (Se-Y) is more effective to increase Se concentration in muscle tissue than inorganic Se. The efficacy of Se yeast to enrich the trace mineral content in meat has been reported not only in beef (Juniper et al, 2008b) but also in veal (Skřivanová et al, 2007), lamb (Vignola et al, 2009), chicken (Skrivan et al, 2008) and pork (Mahan et al, 1999). According to Juniper et al (2008b), the greater concentration of Se in the muscle tissue of bulls offered organic Se when compared with NaSe might arise from an enhanced availability and tissue retention of the trace element.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Juniper et al (2008b), the greater concentration of Se in the muscle tissue of bulls offered organic Se when compared with NaSe might arise from an enhanced availability and tissue retention of the trace element. Both Se sources can be incorporated into GSH-Px, but Se-methionine from the organic one is also nonspecifically incorporated into body proteins as a replacement for methionine (Vignola et al, 2009). In this regard, Juniper et al (2008b) reported a higher concentration of Se in almost all tissues of beef cattle fed Se yeast than selenite as the result of a greater proportion of total Se comprised in tissue protein as Se-methionine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation