2019
DOI: 10.1007/s43452-019-0002-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of service environment and pre-deformation on the fatigue behaviour of 2524 aluminium alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The CaO-particle, graphiteparticle, and Al 2 O 3 -particle environments have a minor effect on the ΔK cr value, but a 12.9% decrease in the ΔK cr value was found in the MnO 2 -particle environment. This contradicts the previous belief [28,29] that fatigue crack growth in its late stage is insensitive to both environment and microstructure. Our previous study [28] identified the fatigue crack propagation behavior of a 2524-T3 aluminium alloy in air, argon, NaCl fog, and exfoliation corrosion solution environments, which showed that these environments mainly affect the FCGRs on the early stage of crack propagation (i.e., low ∆K), and these environmental effects become very minor at ∆K > 20 MPa m 1/2 .…”
Section: Results and Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The CaO-particle, graphiteparticle, and Al 2 O 3 -particle environments have a minor effect on the ΔK cr value, but a 12.9% decrease in the ΔK cr value was found in the MnO 2 -particle environment. This contradicts the previous belief [28,29] that fatigue crack growth in its late stage is insensitive to both environment and microstructure. Our previous study [28] identified the fatigue crack propagation behavior of a 2524-T3 aluminium alloy in air, argon, NaCl fog, and exfoliation corrosion solution environments, which showed that these environments mainly affect the FCGRs on the early stage of crack propagation (i.e., low ∆K), and these environmental effects become very minor at ∆K > 20 MPa m 1/2 .…”
Section: Results and Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…This contradicts the previous belief [28,29] that fatigue crack growth in its late stage is insensitive to both environment and microstructure. Our previous study [28] identified the fatigue crack propagation behavior of a 2524-T3 aluminium alloy in air, argon, NaCl fog, and exfoliation corrosion solution environments, which showed that these environments mainly affect the FCGRs on the early stage of crack propagation (i.e., low ∆K), and these environmental effects become very minor at ∆K > 20 MPa m 1/2 . Besides, Yin et al [29] also indicated the microstructure (such as grain size) effect on the FCGR of aluminium alloy gradually weakens with the increase of ∆K and is only limited at ∆K < 25 MPa m 1/2 .…”
Section: Results and Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fatigue performance of Al alloys is generally affected by two types of factors: external factors, such as service environment [13][14][15] and loading mode, 14,[16][17][18] and intrinsic factors, including grain size, inclusion size, and microstructure homogeneity. [18][19][20][21] Among them, internal defects often lead to the initiation of fatigue cracks and control their high-cycle fatigue (HCF) properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al alloy is widely used in aerospace, railway and automotive engineering 1 due to its superior properties such as a low density and high strength-to-weight ratios; however, fatigue damage is a potential risk to the service safety of Al alloy. 2 It has already led to many fatal accidents that occur even at low stresses. Particularly, with the demand and development of rapid transportation vehicles, the security evaluation of aluminium alloy under fatigue loading is becoming more important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%