Optical Particle Sizing 1988
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-1983-3_34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Shape and Orientation to be Considered for Optical Particle Sizing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results in both cases have a Poisson distribution as might be expected, with a mean particle alignment angle of 23.2 O with no electric field present and of 21 3. " in the presence of the field, with the mean measurement errors for the two cases were t 1.37" and t 1.36 O respectively.…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results in both cases have a Poisson distribution as might be expected, with a mean particle alignment angle of 23.2 O with no electric field present and of 21 3. " in the presence of the field, with the mean measurement errors for the two cases were t 1.37" and t 1.36 O respectively.…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
“…However, in general these instruments do not attempt to assess particle shape but rather attribute a spherical volume equivalent size to each measured particle, based upon an empirical or theoretical calibration function. Particle size spectra may be produced over ranges from sub-micron to tens of microns, though the accuracy and validity of such results has been the subject of some considerable research by workers in the field, for example: Gebhart and Anselm [l], Bottlinger and Umhauer [2], and Killinger et al [3]. The problem lies in the fact that the instruments attempt to assess the particle size by measuring the scattered light intensity at one or a range of scattering angles, and that this intensity is usually dependent on not only the particle's size but also its shape and orientation with respect to the incident illumination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously angles around 160 • were used because it was expected that polarization effects were a maximum there (Card and Jones 1995, Liou and Coleman 1980, Zerull et al 1986. Here angles around 120 • were used due to evidence that cross-polarization is very shape sensitive in this region (Killinger and Zerull 1988, Mugnai and Wiscombe 1989.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that the use of other devices and other light sources (LASER) will deliver different results. Investigations of monochromatic light scattering have shown that the shape and structure influence is much stronger than with the white-light device utilized here [22]. The effort required for the determination of a transformation matrix for a particular substance is relatively high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%