2017
DOI: 10.1007/s40868-017-0033-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of slow steaming strategies on a ship fleet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Psaraftis and Kontovas ( 2010 ) and Dagkinis and Nikitakos ( 2015 ), also analysed the cost of shipping under varying conditions of charter rates and ship speed and concluded that slower speed was the preferred option in terms of costs if the charter rates were low, whereas higher speeds were preferred at higher charter rates. Cepeda et al ( 2017 ), also conducted sensitivity analyses with respect to bunker prices and the costs of new sheets to supplement the fleet, which showed that cost reductions favoured the use of slow steaming if bunker prices are high, and favoured operation at original speed (assuming constant transport work) if the capital expense of new vessels was high.…”
Section: The Analysis Of the Peer-reviewed And Grey Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psaraftis and Kontovas ( 2010 ) and Dagkinis and Nikitakos ( 2015 ), also analysed the cost of shipping under varying conditions of charter rates and ship speed and concluded that slower speed was the preferred option in terms of costs if the charter rates were low, whereas higher speeds were preferred at higher charter rates. Cepeda et al ( 2017 ), also conducted sensitivity analyses with respect to bunker prices and the costs of new sheets to supplement the fleet, which showed that cost reductions favoured the use of slow steaming if bunker prices are high, and favoured operation at original speed (assuming constant transport work) if the capital expense of new vessels was high.…”
Section: The Analysis Of the Peer-reviewed And Grey Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the fleet, adopting slow steaming reduces the number of possible travels for the vehicles over a time horizon (e.g., per year), diminishing the overall capacity. Reducing the available services can lead to negative consequences on revenues, but these can possibly be compensated by the savings on operational and fuel costs [22]. Therefore, adopting slow steaming may require more vehicles and larger ones to maintain the same service quality and satisfy all the demand.…”
Section: Slow Steamingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slow steaming is recognised as an effective short-term measure for reducing GHG, yielding a total fuel saving of approximately 19% if speed is reduced by 10% [16]. Cepeda et al [17] carry out a simulation using a discrete event model of a fleet of thirteen bulk carriers based on fuel consumption, emissions and cargo transported under three conditions: sailing at current speeds, in slow steaming and in Ultra-Low Steaming (ULS). They find a reduction in fuel consumption of 51% for slow steaming and 85% for ULS and a drop in emissions of 22%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%