1981
DOI: 10.1080/01904168109362916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of solution pH on the growth and chemical composition of rice plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the present study agree with the results of other studies (Rahman et al 2009;Chun et al 1997). Alam (1981) also reported substantial reduction in rice plant biomass at pH 8.5. It is likely that the decrease in growth is the result of reduced Fe solubility, bioavailability and uptake due to the formation of Fe-oxide/hydroxide precipitates in the growing medium at high pHs under aerobic conditions (Alam 1981;Rahman et al 2009).…”
Section: Ph and Mgda Concentration Influencesupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of the present study agree with the results of other studies (Rahman et al 2009;Chun et al 1997). Alam (1981) also reported substantial reduction in rice plant biomass at pH 8.5. It is likely that the decrease in growth is the result of reduced Fe solubility, bioavailability and uptake due to the formation of Fe-oxide/hydroxide precipitates in the growing medium at high pHs under aerobic conditions (Alam 1981;Rahman et al 2009).…”
Section: Ph and Mgda Concentration Influencesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Alam (1981) also reported substantial reduction in rice plant biomass at pH 8.5. It is likely that the decrease in growth is the result of reduced Fe solubility, bioavailability and uptake due to the formation of Fe-oxide/hydroxide precipitates in the growing medium at high pHs under aerobic conditions (Alam 1981;Rahman et al 2009). In most soils, Fe 3þ -oxides are a common source of Fe for plants, which after transformation in the rhizosphere is absorbed by plant in ionic and chelated forms via soil solution (Stein et al 2009).…”
Section: Ph and Mgda Concentration Influencementioning
confidence: 86%
“…Ideal pH in hydroponic systems ranges from 5.5 to 6.0, but aquaponic solution pH is managed between 7.0 and 7.5 in an effort to balance the physiological demands of fish, plants, and nitrifying bacteria (Tyson et al, 2004). Differences in solution pH will alter plant nutrient uptake; specifically, uptake of iron and other metals will be reduced at higher pH levels commonly observed in aquaponic solution (Alam, 1981).…”
Section: Solution Chemistry and Nutrient Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacterial transformation of ammonia to nitrite and further to nitrate is optimized at pH 8.5, but plant nutrient uptake for many crop species is optimized near pH 6.0; thus, pH in aquaponic systems is managed near pH 7.0 to ensure sufficient rates of nitrification without jeopardizing plant uptake potential of essential nutrients in solution (Tyson et al, 2004). Higher pH values in aquaponic solution may limit the uptake efficiency of certain essential elements, like iron, which is already limited in aquaponic solution (Alam, 1981;Rakocy et al, 2006). Additional key differences exist between the chemistry of aquaponic and hydroponic solutions (e.g., dissolved organic matter and organic metabolites in aquaponic solution; Rakocy et al, 2006), but nutrient strength (EC) and pH seem to have the strongest potential for influencing physiology and yield of plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Wheat and barley are reported to suffer a reduction in growth at pH 8.5 and 9.0 respectively (Hewitt, 1966).The effects of high salinity of the solution culture on different growth and gas exchange parameters have also been reported by different workers (Richards, 1969;Iqbal, 1992). Alam (1981) studied the effects of different pH levels in solution culture on rice growth and reported that growth was affected adversely at high pH. Optimal dry matter accumulation was noted at pH levels between 5.5 and 6.5, and maximum reduction in growth occurred at both pH 3.5 and 8.5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%