2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.95.014516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of strong disorder in strongly correlated superconductors

Abstract: We investigate the effect of strong disorder on a system with strong electronic repulsion. In absence of disorder, the system has a d-wave superconducting ground-state with strong non-BCS features due to its proximity to a Mott insulator. We find that, while strong correlations make superconductivity in this system immune to weak disorder, superconductivity is destroyed efficiently when disorder strength is comparable to the effective bandwidth. The suppression of charge motion in regions of strong potential f… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, the approach we present here exploits and transfers the accuracy and versatility of modern ab initio simulations to the study of Anderson localization in doped semiconductors-at a fraction of the computational cost. Beyond bulk semiconductors, other disordered systems [64], 2D [65][66][67] and layered materials [68] are also well within reach, as is the investigation of the influence of many-body physics by, e.g., studying the interaction-enabled MIT in 2D Si:P [69,70]. We find that the critical concentration agrees quantitatively with a previous experiment in Si:S by Winkler et al [40].…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…Still, the approach we present here exploits and transfers the accuracy and versatility of modern ab initio simulations to the study of Anderson localization in doped semiconductors-at a fraction of the computational cost. Beyond bulk semiconductors, other disordered systems [64], 2D [65][66][67] and layered materials [68] are also well within reach, as is the investigation of the influence of many-body physics by, e.g., studying the interaction-enabled MIT in 2D Si:P [69,70]. We find that the critical concentration agrees quantitatively with a previous experiment in Si:S by Winkler et al [40].…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…In this work we always report on the superconducting pairing amplitudes ∆ δ i , as is commonly done in GIMT calculations, 40,41,56,57 while technically the superconducting order parameter is given by g t i,i+δ ∆ δ i . 35,58 With both ∆ δ i and τ δ i possibly being complex-valued, we obtain self-consistency on both the real and the imaginary parts. A crucial aspect in this process is the initial guess of the self-consistent variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…We introduce disorder by redefining H t−J to H t−J + iσ (V i − µ)n iσ , where µ is the chemical potential that fixes the average density of electrons, ρ = N −1 iσ n iσ , in the system to a desired value. Such a simple re-definition of the Hamiltonian upon inclusion of disorder, however, would not work for strong disorder (V ≥ 3t) and a modified treatment of Schrieffer-Wolff transformation 47,52 is necessary. Here, we use the model of Box-disorder, where V i 's on all sites i of the lattice are drawn from a uniform 'box' distribution, such that,…”
Section: A Anderson's Prescriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of dSC with strong substitutional impurities, in the limit of unitary scatterers are also available. 4,20,29,45,46 There are subtleties in handling strong correlations and also strong impurities in a meanfield formalism, 47 and the results depend crucially on their relative strengths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%