2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of study levels on students' attitudes towards interactive whiteboards in higher education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Mata, Lazar & Laza conducted a study aimed at examining students' attitudes towards interactive whiteboards (IWB) in higher education [9]. The results revealed revealed the fact that there were relevant differences between students at different study levels regarding their attitudes toward certain factors that defined pedagogical, psychological, group interactions and the availability of IWB factors.…”
Section: A Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mata, Lazar & Laza conducted a study aimed at examining students' attitudes towards interactive whiteboards (IWB) in higher education [9]. The results revealed revealed the fact that there were relevant differences between students at different study levels regarding their attitudes toward certain factors that defined pedagogical, psychological, group interactions and the availability of IWB factors.…”
Section: A Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mata, Lazar & Laza uses a sample of 210 students who have undergraduate studies, 24 master studies and 12 in doctoral studies have responded to the survey [18]. The use of the questionnaire has 4 parts, which focus on the availability of IWB use and components of pedagogy, psychology and group interaction.…”
Section: IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some of these research studies show that the interactive whiteboard has a positive effect on mathematical success (Ekici, 2008;Kaya, Akçakın & Bulut, 2013;Miller, Glover & Averis, 2004;Tezer & Deniz, 2009). Researchers were interested in not only mathematical success, but also the effect of the interactive whiteboard on students' attitudes and motivation (Mata, Lazar & Lazar 2016;Şad 2012). The identification of the impact of interactive whiteboards on success will remain limited in determining the role of smart whiteboards in teaching because the affective characteristics possessed by the learners and the factors influencing these characteristics are influential in learning.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, this study is aims to review different studies on the use of WhatsApp in teaching and learning. In the field of instructional technology, many content analysis were conducted to examine and evaluate research trend of a specified instructional tools such as Interactive Smart board (Mata, Liliana, 2016;Vita, Verschaffel & Elen, 2014), flipped classroom (Zainuddin, & Halili, 2016;Aydın & Demirer, 2016), distance education (Bozkurt et al, 2015), and online learning (Ozyurt & Ozyurt, 2012 is though that such a study bridge a gap in the literature.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%