1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6807(199710)34:4<355::aid-pits7>3.0.co;2-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of subject and rater characteristics on the accuracy of visual analysis of single subject data

Abstract: The accuracy of interpretation of single subject data was evaluated by comparing raters' visual analysis of behavior change with statistical determination of behavior change using the split‐middle methods of trend estimation. In addition, the effects of rater background (undergraduate, graduate student) and characteristics of the fictitious student (gender, label) on the ratings were determined. Results indicated that the accuracy of visual analysis was less than chance (47%). Rater and student characteristics… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several behavior analysts have cautioned against the use of such methods for interpreting singlesubject research (e.g., Baer, 1977). Furthermore, statistical significance does not necessarily indicate educational significance (Richards, Taylor, & Ramasamy, 1997). Furthermore, statistical significance does not necessarily indicate educational significance (Richards, Taylor, & Ramasamy, 1997).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several behavior analysts have cautioned against the use of such methods for interpreting singlesubject research (e.g., Baer, 1977). Furthermore, statistical significance does not necessarily indicate educational significance (Richards, Taylor, & Ramasamy, 1997). Furthermore, statistical significance does not necessarily indicate educational significance (Richards, Taylor, & Ramasamy, 1997).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study used the ABCACB Multiple-Treatment Reversal Design to evaluate the intervention outcome (Kazdin 2011 ; Richards et al 2013 ). The interface content was derived based on 20 types of campus scenarios.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the clear advantages for using a multiple treatment design is the ability to evaluate more than one treatment with the reintroduction of baseline conditions, without validity being compromised (Richard, Taylor, Ramasamay, & Richards, 1998). However, whenever more than one treatment is provided in sequence to the same subjects, there exists the possibility of "multipletreatment interference," or one treatment influencing the other (Kazdin, 1982).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%