1974
DOI: 10.1038/250304a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of succinyl-con A on the growth of normal and transformed cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
2

Year Published

1975
1975
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Gunther etal. (1973) and Trowbridge and Hilborn (1974)]. However, the present study shows that Man7-Man9 oligomannose-type glycopeptides have approximately 4-and 10-fold reduced affinities, respectively, for dimeric Con A and its acetyl-and succinyl-derivatives relative to tetrameric Con A.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gunther etal. (1973) and Trowbridge and Hilborn (1974)]. However, the present study shows that Man7-Man9 oligomannose-type glycopeptides have approximately 4-and 10-fold reduced affinities, respectively, for dimeric Con A and its acetyl-and succinyl-derivatives relative to tetrameric Con A.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…0006-2960/93/0432-5116$04.00/0 Succinyl-and acetyl-Con A are pH-independent dimeric derivatives of the lectin which have been widely used to determine the effects of Con A valency on its biological activities (Gunther et al, 1973;Wang et al, 1976). Such studies include a comparison of thymidine-induced incorporation and mitogenic effects of succinyl-Con A and native tetrameric Con A in normal and transformed cells (Trowbridge & Hilborn, 1974), investigations of the "capping" behavior of cell receptors for dimeric and tetrameric Con A (Gunther et al, 1973), and the cell agglutination properties of dimeric versus tetrameric Con A (Gunther et al, 1973). In view of the similar affinities of acetyl-and succinyl-Con A and the native lectin for monosaccharides such as methyl a-Dglucopyranoside, differences in their biological activities have been attributed to differences in their valencies (Gunther et al, 1973).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dimer, however, is still capable of binding low molecular weight sugar deriva tives and yeast mannan (92) or binding to the surface of transformed cells (105). The dimer in the fo rm of succinyl-Con A is also equally effective as a mitogen as native Con A (219) and, in contrast to an earlier report (269), is capable of inhibiting the growth of normal and transformed cells by an effect manifested during the early G1 phase of the cell cycle (159). Agglutination or precipitation may therefore represent a two-step process: the first step involving a simple monovalent or possibly divalent binding process which is apparently sufficient to trigger mitogenesis or to inhibit cell growth, and a second step involving a multivalent process in which the cross-linking of macromolecules, or of cell surface receptor sites, results in the precipitation of macromolecules or in the agglutination of cells respectively.…”
Section: Assays For Biological Activitycontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Succinyl-Con A was found not to alter significantly the growth rates of SV3T3, Py3T3 or 3T3 itself (Trowbridge and Hilborn, 1974).…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%