2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4812736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of surface oxide layer on nanocavity formation and silver gettering in hydrogen ion implanted silicon

Abstract: We have made an investigation of the surface oxide effects on nanocavity formation in hydrogen implanted silicon and the influence of resultant nanocavities on diffusion and gettering of implanted silver atoms. A wafer with a 200-nm SiO2 surface layer was implanted with 22.5 keV H ions to a dose of 1 × 1017 cm−2, yielding the concentration peak of implanted H ions at ∼140 nm below the SiO2/Si interface. Subsequently, two sets of Si samples were prepared, depending on whether the oxide layer was etched off befo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case with both H þ and Ni þ implants, the reverse annealing effect only occurs at 800 C, to a much smaller degree. This is because H induced nanocavities serve as sinks for Si interstitials to decrease their accumulation in the implanted region, 20 favoring the formation of single-crystal structures in the Ni implanted region by suppressing nucleation of displaced Si atoms at silicide precipitates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case with both H þ and Ni þ implants, the reverse annealing effect only occurs at 800 C, to a much smaller degree. This is because H induced nanocavities serve as sinks for Si interstitials to decrease their accumulation in the implanted region, 20 favoring the formation of single-crystal structures in the Ni implanted region by suppressing nucleation of displaced Si atoms at silicide precipitates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because metal atoms are preferentially filling the relatively small cavities due to their high surface energy density. 20 So one may arrive at a lower bound of magnetic moment as $2970 l B per Ni nanoparticle, or as $0.22 l B per Ni atom, after dividing the saturated magnetization by the number of nanocavities or the number of gettered Ni atoms, respectively. For comparison, the magnetic moment per atom in the Ni bulk crystals $0.61 l B .…”
Section: Implications On Magnetic Anisotropy and Particle Interactmentioning
confidence: 99%