Background Previous studies of therapy for acquired anomia have treated nouns in isolation. The effect on nouns in connected speech remains unclear. In our recent study we used a novel noun syntax therapy (Herbert, R., Webster, D., & Dyson, L., 2012, Effects of syntactic cueing therapy on picture naming and connected speech in acquired aphasia. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 22, and found an increase in the number of determiner plus noun constructions in narrative after therapy.
AimsTwo aims arose from the previous study: to identify the critical ingredient in the noun syntax therapy, specifically whether this is lexical production, or the syntactic context; to extend the analysis of the effects beyond narrative into conversation.
Methods and proceduresWe compared the effects of lexical therapy with those of noun syntax therapy in one individual with aphasia, in a sequential intervention design. We analysed the effects on conversation and on narrative.
Outcomes and ResultsThere was improved picture naming of treated words after both therapies. Lexical therapy had no impact on narrative and conversation, whereas noun syntax therapy led to more noun production, primarily in the context of determiner plus noun combinations.
Conclusions and implicationsThe results support the claim that greater impact on narrative and conversation can be achieved for some people with aphasia, by treating nouns in syntactic contexts.What this paper adds Research into anomia therapy suggests that purely lexical approaches, treating words in isolation, are not guaranteed to impact on narrative or conversation. We describe here a therapy which provides one means of bridging that gap, by treating nouns in determiner plus noun phrases. In this single case study we found an impact on narrative and conversation from the noun syntax therapy but not from the lexical therapy. We provide prognostic indicators relating to selection of this therapy for other speakers with aphasia.3