2016
DOI: 10.5937/gads51-12155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of teaching physical education on the morphological characteristics of male students of younger school

Abstract: 1Učiteljski fakultet u Prizrenu -Leposaviću, Leposavić 2 Fakultet sporta i fizičkog vaspitanja, Niš Sažetak.Rešavanje složenih zadataka u procesu vaspitanja i obrazovanja učenika, kao i njihovom uticaju po zdravlje i rast i razvoj dece, zahteva dobro poznavanje uzrasnih karakteristika, u ovom slučaju dece mlađeg školskog uzrasta. Ovaj rad je upravo imao za cilj da utvrdi u kojoj meri eksperimentalni program primenjen u periodu od jedne školske godine utiče na promene morfoloških karakteristika učenika. Primenj… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Foot lengths of the first and second measurements were significant in both the experimental group and the control group (p < .05) (Riddiford-Harland et al, 2016). The effects of physical education classes (Zrnzević & Zrnzević, 2016) lasting six months with the frequency of three times a week had a positive effect on arm length, leg length, shoulder width, pelvic width, wrist width, chest circumference, upper arm circumference, thigh circumference between initial and final measurements (p < .01), while in the variables such as skin folds of the triceps, skin folds subscapularis, abdomen skinfold no effects of physical education were found. Activities such as jumping and dancing show that there was a difference between the control group and the group that applied the physical activity program in skin folds of the triceps (p < .01) in both boys and girls (Aguilar et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Foot lengths of the first and second measurements were significant in both the experimental group and the control group (p < .05) (Riddiford-Harland et al, 2016). The effects of physical education classes (Zrnzević & Zrnzević, 2016) lasting six months with the frequency of three times a week had a positive effect on arm length, leg length, shoulder width, pelvic width, wrist width, chest circumference, upper arm circumference, thigh circumference between initial and final measurements (p < .01), while in the variables such as skin folds of the triceps, skin folds subscapularis, abdomen skinfold no effects of physical education were found. Activities such as jumping and dancing show that there was a difference between the control group and the group that applied the physical activity program in skin folds of the triceps (p < .01) in both boys and girls (Aguilar et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%