2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2011.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of testing variables on stress corrosion cracking susceptibility of Al 2024-T351

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SSRT experiments by Haruna and Shibata on cylindrical 316L stainless steel exposed to aqueous NaCl solutions in which the tests were interrupted and then cross-sectioned for evaluation revealed crack initiation and propagation prior to failure [38]. Lee et al speculated that the fracture of AA2024-T351 SSRT specimens exposed to aqueous chloride solutions resulted from the formation of pits, which enabled the initiation and propagation of cracks, leading to final failure [31]. Lastly, modeling of SSRT experiments by Garud explicitly includes the formation and propagation of 'microcracks' as the means by which the net-section load-carrying capacity is diminished [39].…”
Section: Evidence For the Onset Of Sub-critical Cracking During Ssrt mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SSRT experiments by Haruna and Shibata on cylindrical 316L stainless steel exposed to aqueous NaCl solutions in which the tests were interrupted and then cross-sectioned for evaluation revealed crack initiation and propagation prior to failure [38]. Lee et al speculated that the fracture of AA2024-T351 SSRT specimens exposed to aqueous chloride solutions resulted from the formation of pits, which enabled the initiation and propagation of cracks, leading to final failure [31]. Lastly, modeling of SSRT experiments by Garud explicitly includes the formation and propagation of 'microcracks' as the means by which the net-section load-carrying capacity is diminished [39].…”
Section: Evidence For the Onset Of Sub-critical Cracking During Ssrt mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, depending on the environment of interest, SSRT metrics have been shown to be strongly dependent on testing variables and specimen geometry. In particular, SSRT results have been found to be affected by the applied displacement rate [30][31][32], the specimen surface finish [26,28,33], and the specimen diameter [30]. For example, McIntyre noted that a slight change in strain rate from 4.0 × 10 −6 to 3.5 × 10 −6 s −1 resulted in a 14% decrease in time to failure for testing in a simulated sour gas environment (alloy not specified) [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burleigh [14] reviewed the earlier research on aluminum alloy SCC and believed that anodic dissolution type SCC mainly occurs in Al-Cu-Mg alloy, while hydrogen induced cracking type SCC exists in Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy. In contrast, a great number of later researches argued that the synergy mechanism of the two types can better explain the essence of high strength Aluminum Alloy SCC [8][9][10]. In this paper, the addition of significantly promoted the stress corrosion behavior of the two kinds of high strength aluminum alloy.…”
Section: . Analysis Of Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…We believe that this is because the natural environment corrosion test generally needs a long time, but the completed test is mainly concerned with the weight loss and morphology change for the corrosion. It is difficult to carry out in-depth study of its stress corrosion behavior.Recently, researchers usually use the tensile test in the solution for the study of stress corrosion of aluminum alloy [8][9][10]. But in the marine atmosphere, the essence of aluminum alloy corrosion is the electricity chemical process in unsteady thin electrolytes layer whose thickness, shape and distribution will be of cyclical changes due to temperature, humidity, light, rainfall and other factors with alternating effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for a high strength Al-Cu-Mg alloy, PFZ has the lowest potential than the CuAl 2 and α matrix. The inhibition of the formation of PFZ is the primary way to improve the resistance of the Al-Cu-Mg alloy to SCC [ 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%