1985
DOI: 10.1016/0741-8329(85)90068-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of the maternal consumption of alcohol on alcohol selection in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although no data are presented about the daily consumption pattern of these doses, it is well known that food and fluid ingestion takes place mainly during the dark phase. This was corroborated in the study by Reyes et al (1985) in which pregnant rats with access to a liquid diet containing ethanol displayed significantly higher blood ethanol levels (170 mg% at 0700 h) at the end of the dark period than after the light phase (30 mg% at 1700 h). With the liquid diet procedure, increased ethanol intake has been detected in the offspring of dams consuming ethanol doses as low as 10.5 or 7.6 g/kg/day (Hilakivi, 1986;Hilakivi et al, 1987).…”
Section: -16supporting
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although no data are presented about the daily consumption pattern of these doses, it is well known that food and fluid ingestion takes place mainly during the dark phase. This was corroborated in the study by Reyes et al (1985) in which pregnant rats with access to a liquid diet containing ethanol displayed significantly higher blood ethanol levels (170 mg% at 0700 h) at the end of the dark period than after the light phase (30 mg% at 1700 h). With the liquid diet procedure, increased ethanol intake has been detected in the offspring of dams consuming ethanol doses as low as 10.5 or 7.6 g/kg/day (Hilakivi, 1986;Hilakivi et al, 1987).…”
Section: -16supporting
confidence: 73%
“…In all those studies in which no effect of prenatal ethanol exposure on consumption was reported, ethanol doses administered to the dam ranged from 1 g/kg administered i.g. from GD7 to the end of gestation (Abel and York, 1979) to 16.85 g/kg consumed in an ethanol-containing liquid diet (Reyes et al, 1985). Considering that these ethanol doses are similar to those employed in studies in which the effect was observed, it can be concluded that the failure to observe increased ethanol intake in the afore-mentioned studies was not related to differences in the amount of ethanol reaching the fetus.…”
Section: -16mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, neither Abel and York (1979) and Anton (1983) found that mouse fetuses whose dams were exposed to the drug between G8 and birth consumed more ethanol during P25-P32 (i.e., the age range of juvenile and early adolescent development) than did controls, but this effect was not seen between P33 and P46. Reyes, Garcia, and Jones (1985) found that prenatal exposure from G1 until birth yielded greater preference for ethanol (in males only) for only the first half of a 30-day test in late adolescent/young adult rats (P45-P60). More recent studies with more selective prenatal exposure to ethanol (maternal intragastric administration of 1 or 2 g/kg ethanol during late gestation (G17-G20) have uniformly reported enhanced ethanol intake early in development, prior to weaning and in adolescence (Chotro et al, 2007;Molina, Spear, Spear, Mennella, & Lewis, 2007;Spear & Molina, 2005).…”
Section: Nih-pa Author Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%