1990
DOI: 10.1016/0014-2999(90)90679-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of urethane and ketamine on substance P- and excitatory amino acid-induced behavior in mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cells responsible for centrifugal input from OC or AON would not be included in regular OB slices and are likely to be affected by anesthetics (urethane is thought to affect NMDA receptors (Dalo and Larson, 1990)) explaining why ultrafast synchronization is not found in these preparations. Interestingly, if excitatory centrifugal input is involved then these fibers would have to make excitatory synapses on MCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells responsible for centrifugal input from OC or AON would not be included in regular OB slices and are likely to be affected by anesthetics (urethane is thought to affect NMDA receptors (Dalo and Larson, 1990)) explaining why ultrafast synchronization is not found in these preparations. Interestingly, if excitatory centrifugal input is involved then these fibers would have to make excitatory synapses on MCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…urethane can be a useful anesthetic for experiments on the central organization of lower urinary tract function in rats. However, it should be cautioned that urethane interferes with the actions of glutamate and its analogs [Daló and Larsson, 1990;Evans and Smith, 1982]. In particular, there is a significant interaction between urethane and NMDA receptor-dependent glutamatergic neurotransmission in the micturition pathway [Yoshiyama et al, 1994].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have already reported that the use of anaesthesia constitutes a very serious experimental bias (Crawford, 1970;Nicoll and Madison, 1982;Heym et al, 1984;Kelland et al, 1989;Dalo and Larson, 1990;Mereu et al, 1994Mereu et al, , 1995Pirot et al, 1995;Melis et al, 1998), in great part due to anaesthetic actions on many channel coupledreceptors, as has been recently reviewed (Mihic and Harris, 1997). All these data emphasize that care must be taken in the interpretation of results obtained in anaesthetized animals to infer a normal function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%