2000
DOI: 10.1177/154193120004401104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Variable-Priority Training on Automation-Related Complacency: Performance and Eye Movements

Abstract: The effectiveness of variable-priority training in reducing automation-related complacency was examined. Participants were trained under one of three attention allocation strategies, whole task (WT), part task (PT), or variable priority (VP). They subsequently monitored an automated system while simultaneously performing tracking and fuel management tasks. Eye movements were recorded to investigate attention allocation strategies. Results pointed to a trend for VP training to reduce complacency, compared to WT… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future studies can examine the applicability of countermeasures to complacency, such as variable-priority training (Kramer et al, 1995;Metzger et al, 2000) and adaptive task allocation strategies (Parasuraman et al, 1996) since it is uncertain whether these strategies would benefit seniors. Additional research should also examine trust and reliance of automation with older adults under less stressful conditions than the present experiment and in more realistic ecologically valid conditions.…”
Section: Design Implications and Future Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future studies can examine the applicability of countermeasures to complacency, such as variable-priority training (Kramer et al, 1995;Metzger et al, 2000) and adaptive task allocation strategies (Parasuraman et al, 1996) since it is uncertain whether these strategies would benefit seniors. Additional research should also examine trust and reliance of automation with older adults under less stressful conditions than the present experiment and in more realistic ecologically valid conditions.…”
Section: Design Implications and Future Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with fixed, equalpriority training (50% and 50%), variable-priority training results in faster acquisition of dualtask skills. Accordingly, Metzger, Duley, Abbas, and Parasuraman (2000) trained participants in the three subtasks of the MATB using either the variable-or the fixed-priority method and examined both overall performance and detection of failures in the automated task (complacency). Variable-priority training led to better multitasking performance, and a trend for a reduction in the automation complacency effect was observed.…”
Section: Factors Influencing Automation Complacencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the nautical environment, watchkeepers are increasingly responsible for secondary task functions such as engine and cargo control, in addition to the primary task of navigation. This requires that cognitive resources are deployed across several tasks to maintain overall performance (Metzger et al 2000). In addition to the dramatic increase in monitoring load and the overheads of managing divided cognitive resources, the need to control a broader range of engineering functions also places new demands on the knowledge and skills of the watchkeeper (Lee and Sanquist 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%