2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00453.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Various Beverages on Hardness, Roughness, and Solubility of Esthetic Restorative Materials

Abstract: Low pH beverages were the most aggressive media for glass ionomers and compomer, by contrast, composite resin was relatively less affected. Water and natural milk appeared relatively benign towards the tested materials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

11
85
0
13

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
11
85
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, Filtek Z250, Filtek Supreme, and Premise exhibited less surface hardness change with no significant differences among them than did Compoglass F at each immersion period. This was because the citric acid found in the sports and energy drinks affected the solubility of compomer Compoglass F more than the other resin composites 17,30) . Among the examined sports and energy drinks, Burn -with the lowest pH at 2.67-had the greatest surface hardness reduction effect on the restorative materials tested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, Filtek Z250, Filtek Supreme, and Premise exhibited less surface hardness change with no significant differences among them than did Compoglass F at each immersion period. This was because the citric acid found in the sports and energy drinks affected the solubility of compomer Compoglass F more than the other resin composites 17,30) . Among the examined sports and energy drinks, Burn -with the lowest pH at 2.67-had the greatest surface hardness reduction effect on the restorative materials tested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Citric acid has been shown to be the most aggressive storage medium for dental hard tissues and resin-based restorative materials 28,30,39) . Compared to compomers, pure composite resins were found to be less affected by low-pH beverages 17) or acidic solutions 28) . Therefore, Filtek Z250, Filtek Supreme, and Premise exhibited less surface hardness change with no significant differences among them than did Compoglass F at each immersion period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of studies have evaluated the effect of different beverages on the surface of resin composites 13,15,[17][18][19] , but few have performed long-term evaluations, likely due to the difficulties such as daily changes of the immersion media.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the surface characteristics of a resin composite contribute to the clinical longevity of a restoration 12 . Although a number of studies have addressed the effects of different solutions on the surface of resin composites [13][14][15] , few have performed longterm evaluations. Thus, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the surface roughness (Ra) of a resin composite submitted to immersion in different beverages one hour per day for three, six, nine and 12 months.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%