1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf01544232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of victim gender and physical vs. psychological trauma/injury on observers' perceptions of sexual assault and its aftereffects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
47
3
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
47
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This could either be due to observers finding male rape difficult to understand and accept, or due to observers perceiving the male victim to be unmasculine and submissive (Anderson & Lyons, 2005). Although less convincing and widespread, contradictory results have also been reported, whereby women are blamed to a greater extent for their victimization than men (Idisis, Ben-David, & Ben-Nachum, 2007;Schneider, Soh-Chiew Ee, & Aronson, 1994), leading some researchers to propose that there are additional moderating variables at work when rape blame attributions are being formulated (Mitchell, Angelone, Kohlberger, & Hirschman, 2009). …”
Section: Victim Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could either be due to observers finding male rape difficult to understand and accept, or due to observers perceiving the male victim to be unmasculine and submissive (Anderson & Lyons, 2005). Although less convincing and widespread, contradictory results have also been reported, whereby women are blamed to a greater extent for their victimization than men (Idisis, Ben-David, & Ben-Nachum, 2007;Schneider, Soh-Chiew Ee, & Aronson, 1994), leading some researchers to propose that there are additional moderating variables at work when rape blame attributions are being formulated (Mitchell, Angelone, Kohlberger, & Hirschman, 2009). …”
Section: Victim Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on social reactions to male victims have shown that they are often blamed as intensely or even more so than female victims (Perrott & Webber, 1996;Smith, Pine & Hawley, 1988;Struckman-Johnson & Struckman-Johnson, 1992;Whatley & Riggio, 1993) although some studies have shown the opposite effect (e.g., Anderson, 1999;Schneider, Soh-Chiew Ee and Aronson, 1994). Several reasons, such as the greater deviation from expected sexual script and gender roles of male as opposed to female victims (Donnelly & Kenyon, 1996), the supposition of homosexuality in male rape (Mitchell et al, 1999), as well as individual differences such as the perceiver's generalized beliefs in a 'just world' (Perrott & Webber, 1996) may contribute to harsher perceptions of male than female victims.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be because men are not expected to foresee rape as a potential occurrence as readily as female victims are (McCaul et al;Schneider et al, 1994;Perrott and Webber, 1996;Anderson, 1999). On the other hand, it is a commonplace assumption that women should restrict their behaviour according to societal expectations of 'respectable femininity' (dress modestly, don't go out unaccompanied at night etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%